Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 5 |
Descriptor
Source
| Assessment & Evaluation in… | 5 |
Author
| Browne, Chris | 1 |
| Dyer, Jen | 1 |
| Handley, Fiona | 1 |
| Hill, Robyn A. | 1 |
| Ivkovic, Amelie | 1 |
| McDonnell, Jacqueline A. | 1 |
| Mudarikwa, Ruvimbo S. | 1 |
| Nestel, Debra | 1 |
| Nulty, Duncan D. | 1 |
| Paraskevas, Paraskeva A. | 1 |
| Rantanen, Pekka | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 5 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 3 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 2 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 4 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Australia | 1 |
| Finland (Helsinki) | 1 |
| United Kingdom | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Wilson, Caroline; Sims, Stuart; Dyer, Jen; Handley, Fiona – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2022
The higher education sector is under increasing pressure to deliver more and to evidence the fruits of its contribution to society. There is a particular focus on the enhanced engagement of students in order to maximise success, and for this engagement to be achieved equitably across the student body, regardless of demographic backgrounds. This…
Descriptors: Student Evaluation, Evaluation Methods, Learner Engagement, Outcomes of Education
Rantanen, Pekka – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2013
A multilevel analysis approach was used to analyse students' evaluation of teaching (SET). The low value of inter-rater reliability stresses that any solid conclusions on teaching cannot be made on the basis of single feedbacks. To assess a teacher's general teaching effectiveness, one needs to evaluate four randomly chosen course implementations.…
Descriptors: Test Reliability, Feedback (Response), Generalizability Theory, Student Evaluation of Teacher Performance
Nulty, Duncan D. – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2011
This paper reviews the literature about peer and self-assessment in university courses from the point of view of their use, and the suitability of their use, in the first year of university study. The paper is divided into three parts. The first part argues that although first-year students are involved in many of the studies that report on the…
Descriptors: College Freshmen, Program Effectiveness, Literature Reviews, Self Evaluation (Individuals)
Nestel, Debra; Ivkovic, Amelie; Hill, Robyn A.; Warrens, Anthony N.; Paraskevas, Paraskeva A.; McDonnell, Jacqueline A.; Mudarikwa, Ruvimbo S.; Browne, Chris – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2012
Programme evaluation is essential for quality assurance in education. In this paper, we describe our evaluation strategy for the first year of a new medical programme. Although we used multiple methods in the evaluation, the use of the focus group method was core. This paper reports our experiences of focus groups for this purpose. We describe the…
Descriptors: Qualitative Research, Medical Schools, Research Methodology, Focus Groups
Stodberg, Ulf – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2012
The use of e-assessment in higher education is a relatively new educational practice that has been more frequently studied in recent years. This review aims to summarise some research on e-assessment, providing an overview based on articles from three well-established scientific journals. Focusing on research topics, settings for e-assessment and…
Descriptors: Program Effectiveness, Online Courses, Longitudinal Studies, Research Methodology

Peer reviewed
Direct link
