Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 4 |
Descriptor
| Testing | 5 |
| Writing Evaluation | 5 |
| Writing Tests | 5 |
| Comparative Analysis | 3 |
| Essays | 3 |
| Computer Assisted Testing | 2 |
| Educational Technology | 2 |
| Handwriting | 2 |
| Interrater Reliability | 2 |
| Student Attitudes | 2 |
| Student Evaluation | 2 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Assessing Writing | 5 |
Author
| Baker, Beverly A. | 1 |
| Bivens-Tatum, Jennifer | 1 |
| Bridgeman, Brent | 1 |
| Chen, Jing | 1 |
| Chun, Young | 1 |
| Lee, H. K. | 1 |
| McCloskey, Michael | 1 |
| Petersen, Jerry | 1 |
| Soroui, Jaleh | 1 |
| Trapani, Catherine | 1 |
| White, Sheida | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 5 |
| Reports - Research | 4 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 3 |
| Postsecondary Education | 2 |
| Adult Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Canada | 1 |
| Washington | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Bridgeman, Brent; Trapani, Catherine; Bivens-Tatum, Jennifer – Assessing Writing, 2011
Writing task variants can increase test security in high-stakes essay assessments by substantially increasing the pool of available writing stimuli and by making the specific writing task less predictable. A given prompt (parent) may be used as the basis for one or more different variants. Six variant types based on argument essay prompts from a…
Descriptors: Writing Evaluation, Writing Tests, Tests, Writing Instruction
Chen, Jing; White, Sheida; McCloskey, Michael; Soroui, Jaleh; Chun, Young – Assessing Writing, 2011
This study investigated the comparability of paper and computer versions of a functional writing assessment administered to adults 16 and older. Three writing tasks were administered in both paper and computer modes to volunteers in the field test of an assessment of adult literacy in 2008. One set of analyses examined mode effects on scoring by…
Descriptors: Writing Evaluation, Writing Tests, Computer Assisted Testing, Educational Technology
Baker, Beverly A. – Assessing Writing, 2010
In high-stakes writing assessments, rater training in the use of a rating scale does not eliminate variability in grade attribution. This realisation has been accompanied by research that explores possible sources of rater variability, such as rater background or rating scale type. However, there has been little consideration thus far of…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Writing Evaluation, Writing Tests, Testing
Petersen, Jerry – Assessing Writing, 2009
Large-scale writing programs can add value to the traditional timed writing assessment by using aspects of the essays to assess the effectiveness of institutional goals, programs, and curriculums. The "six learning goals" prompt in this study represents an attempt to provide an accurate writing assessment that moves beyond scores. This…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Writing Evaluation, Student Evaluation, Writing Tests
Lee, H. K. – Assessing Writing, 2004
This study aimed to comprehensively investigate the impact of a word-processor on an ESL writing assessment, covering comparison of inter-rater reliability, the quality of written products, the writing process across different testing occasions using different writing media, and students' perception of a computer-delivered test. Writing samples of…
Descriptors: Writing Evaluation, Student Attitudes, Writing Tests, Testing

Peer reviewed
Direct link
