Compared approaches to determining the precision of gain scores: (1) the asymptotic normal distribution of the maximum likelihood estimator of the person parameter; and (2) the exact conditional distribution of the gain score. Use of three data sets illustrates that these methods yield more relevant and more detailed information than traditional…

Alternative models for a large dataset were analyzed by asymptotically distribution-free, generalized least squares, maximum likelihood, and ordinary least squares estimation methods, comparing incremental and nonincremental fit indexes. Incremental methods were quite unstable across estimation methods. This phenomenon is explained. (SLD)

Studied the extent to which three appropriateness indexes, Z(sub 3), ECIZ4, and W, are well standardized in a Monte Carlo study. The ECIZ4 most closely approximated a normal distribution, and its skewness and kurtosis were more stable and less affected by test length and item response theory model than the others. (SLD)

Previous work on the mathematical and implementation details of the marginalized maximum likelihood estimation procedure is extended to encompass the marginalized Bayesian procedure for estimating item parameters of R. J. Mislevy (1986) and to communicate this procedure to users of the BILOG computer program. (SLD)

The sensitivity of marginal maximum likelihood estimation of item and ability (theta) parameters was examined when prior ability distributions were not matched to underlying ability distributions. Thirty sets of 45-item test data were generated. Conditions affecting the accuracy of estimation are discussed. (SLD)