Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Source
| Applied Psychological… | 4 |
Author
| Johnson, Timothy R. | 1 |
| Kieftenbeld, Vincent | 1 |
| Natesan, Prathiba | 1 |
| Skaggs, Gary | 1 |
| Stevenson, Jose | 1 |
| Woods, Carol M. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 4 |
| Reports - Research | 3 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Johnson, Timothy R. – Applied Psychological Measurement, 2013
One of the distinctions between classical test theory and item response theory is that the former focuses on sum scores and their relationship to true scores, whereas the latter concerns item responses and their relationship to latent scores. Although item response theory is often viewed as the richer of the two theories, sum scores are still…
Descriptors: Item Response Theory, Scores, Computation, Bayesian Statistics
Kieftenbeld, Vincent; Natesan, Prathiba – Applied Psychological Measurement, 2012
Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods enable a fully Bayesian approach to parameter estimation of item response models. In this simulation study, the authors compared the recovery of graded response model parameters using marginal maximum likelihood (MML) and Gibbs sampling (MCMC) under various latent trait distributions, test lengths, and…
Descriptors: Test Length, Markov Processes, Item Response Theory, Monte Carlo Methods
Woods, Carol M. – Applied Psychological Measurement, 2011
Differential item functioning (DIF) occurs when an item on a test, questionnaire, or interview has different measurement properties for one group of people versus another, irrespective of true group-mean differences on the constructs being measured. This article is focused on item response theory based likelihood ratio testing for DIF (IRT-LR or…
Descriptors: Simulation, Item Response Theory, Testing, Questionnaires
Peer reviewedSkaggs, Gary; Stevenson, Jose – Applied Psychological Measurement, 1989
Pseudo-Bayesian and joint maximum likelihood procedures were compared for their ability to estimate item parameters for item response theory's (IRT's) three-parameter logistic model. Item responses were generated for sample sizes of 2,000 and 500; test lengths of 35 and 15; and examinees of high, medium, and low ability. (TJH)
Descriptors: Bayesian Statistics, Comparative Analysis, Computer Software, Estimation (Mathematics)

Direct link
