Descriptor
Source
| Applied Psychological… | 3 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Opinion Papers | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Rod and Frame Test | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedDe Lisi, Richard; Smith, Jeffrey K. – Applied Psychological Measurement, 1979
The reliability of Oltman's Portable Rod and Frame Test (PRFT) was assessed using 60 first-, third-, and fifth-grade children. Various reliability estimates ranged from .90 to .97. Age and sex differences were also examined. (Author/BH)
Descriptors: Age Differences, Cognitive Style, Cognitive Tests, Elementary Education
Peer reviewedMcGarvey, Bill; And Others – Applied Psychological Measurement, 1977
The most consistently used scoring system for the rod-and-frame task has been the total number of degrees in error from the true vertical. Since a logical case can be made for at least four alternative scoring systems, a thorough comparison of all five systems was performed. (Author/CTM)
Descriptors: Analysis of Variance, Cognitive Style, Cognitive Tests, Elementary Education
Peer reviewedMenasco, Michael B.; Curry, David J. – Applied Psychological Measurement, 1978
Scores on the Role Construct Repertory Test exhibited significant correlations with other forms of cognitive functioning, including American College Test scores in science and mathematics for a group of 79 college students. The Grid Form of the test was used. Test-retest reliability was low. (Author/CTM)
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Cognitive Processes, Cognitive Style, Cognitive Tests


