Descriptor
| Adult Students | 1 |
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Decoding (Reading) | 1 |
| Error Patterns | 1 |
| High School Students | 1 |
| High Schools | 1 |
| Phoneme Grapheme… | 1 |
| Reading Skills | 1 |
| Spelling | 1 |
Source
| Applied Psycholinguistics | 1 |
Author
| Perin, Dolores | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedPerin, Dolores – Applied Psycholinguistics, 1982
Good and poor readers, 15- and 16-year-olds and adult literacy students, were compared in their ability to produce graphemic representations for four specific phonemes. Good readers were significantly better than poor readers at representing the critical phonemes, but intentional ambiguity had a similar effect on all. (MSE)
Descriptors: Adult Students, Comparative Analysis, Decoding (Reading), Error Patterns
