In this study we compared five item selection procedures using three ability estimation methods in the context of a mixed-format adaptive test based on the generalized partial credit model. The item selection procedures used were maximum posterior weighted information, maximum expected information, maximum posterior weighted Kullback-Leibler information, and maximum expected posterior weighted Kullback-Leibler information procedures. The ability estimation methods investigated were maximum likelihood estimation (MLE), weighted likelihood estimation (WLE), and expected a posteriori (EAP). Results suggested that all item selection procedures, regardless of the information functions on which they were based, performed equally well across ability estimation methods. The principal conclusions drawn about the ability estimation methods are that MLE is a practical choice and WLE should be considered when there is a mismatch between pool information and the population ability distribution. EAP can serve as a viable alternative when an appropriate prior ability distribution is specified. Several implications of the findings for applied measurement are discussed. (Contains 5 tables and 6 figures.)