NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 5 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Haladyna, Thomas M.; Rodriguez, Michael C.; Stevens, Craig – Applied Measurement in Education, 2019
The evidence is mounting regarding the guidance to employ more three-option multiple-choice items. From theoretical analyses, empirical results, and practical considerations, such items are of equal or higher quality than four- or five-option items, and more items can be administered to improve content coverage. This study looks at 58 tests,…
Descriptors: Multiple Choice Tests, Test Items, Testing Problems, Guessing (Tests)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Jones, Lyle V. – Applied Measurement in Education, 1988
Use of multiple-choice achievement tests is critiqued. Multiple-choice tests are considered heavily weighted toward aptitude and ill-suited to assessment of thinking. Psychometric methods for the development of alternatives to this inadequate form of testing achievement are discussed. (TJH)
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Creative Thinking, Educational Assessment, Educational Research
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Frary, Robert B. – Applied Measurement in Education, 1993
Methods for detecting copying of multiple-choice test responses are reviewed and compared with respect to their effectiveness and the practicality of their application for groups of varying sizes. Reasons why effective detection methods are seldom applied in standardized and classroom testing are discussed. (SLD)
Descriptors: Cheating, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods, Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Haladyna, Thomas A. – Applied Measurement in Education, 1992
Several multiple-choice item formats are examined in the current climate of test reform. The reform movement is discussed as it affects use of the following formats: (1) complex multiple-choice; (2) alternate choice; (3) true-false; (4) multiple true-false; and (5) the context dependent item set. (SLD)
Descriptors: Cognitive Psychology, Comparative Testing, Context Effect, Educational Change
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Hambleton, Ronald K.; Murphy, Edward – Applied Measurement in Education, 1992
The validity of several criticisms of objective tests is addressed, and the viability of some alternatives to objective testing is discussed. Evidence against multiple-choice tests is not as strong as has been claimed. Authentic assessments may not always be better, and research about new forms of assessment is necessary. (SLD)
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Educational Assessment, Literature Reviews, Measurement Techniques