Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Difficulty Level | 2 |
| Grade 5 | 2 |
| Reading Achievement | 2 |
| Test Items | 2 |
| Accessibility (for Disabled) | 1 |
| Achievement Tests | 1 |
| Attitude Measures | 1 |
| Barriers | 1 |
| Cognitive Ability | 1 |
| Cognitive Processes | 1 |
| Cutting Scores | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Applied Measurement in… | 2 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
| Elementary Education | 2 |
| Grade 5 | 2 |
| Intermediate Grades | 1 |
| Middle Schools | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Ohio | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkCohen, Dale J.; Zhang, Jin; Wothke, Werner – Applied Measurement in Education, 2019
Construct-irrelevant cognitive complexity of some items in the statewide grade-level assessments may impose performance barriers for students with disabilities who are ineligible for alternate assessments based on alternate achievement standards. This has spurred research into whether items can be modified to reduce complexity without affecting…
Descriptors: Test Items, Accessibility (for Disabled), Students with Disabilities, Low Achievement
Hein, Serge F.; Skaggs, Gary E. – Applied Measurement in Education, 2009
Only a small number of qualitative studies have investigated panelists' experiences during standard-setting activities or the thought processes associated with panelists' actions. This qualitative study involved an examination of the experiences of 11 panelists who participated in a prior, one-day standard-setting meeting in which either the…
Descriptors: Focus Groups, Standard Setting, Cutting Scores, Cognitive Processes
