Descriptor
| College Entrance Examinations | 2 |
| State Programs | 2 |
| Testing Programs | 2 |
| College Applicants | 1 |
| Criteria | 1 |
| Estimation (Mathematics) | 1 |
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Item Bias | 1 |
| Mathematical Models | 1 |
| Participation | 1 |
| Scores | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Applied Measurement in… | 2 |
Author
| Holland, Paul W. | 2 |
| Wainer, Howard | 2 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Information Analyses | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| SAT (College Admission Test) | 2 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedHolland, Paul W.; Wainer, Howard – Applied Measurement in Education, 1990
The attempt by D.Edwards and C. B. Cummings to adjust state mean Scholastic Aptitude Test Scores for differential participation rates with a "fuzzy truncation model" satisfies three criteria the authors previously defined but falls short for two. Omission of sensitivity studies mars the otherwise exemplary study. (SLD)
Descriptors: College Entrance Examinations, Criteria, Higher Education, Participation
Peer reviewedHolland, Paul W.; Wainer, Howard – Applied Measurement in Education, 1990
Two attempts to adjust state mean Scholastic Aptitude Test (SAT) scores for differential participation rates are examined. Both attempts are rejected, and five rules for performing adjustments are outlined to foster follow-up checks on untested assumptions. National Assessment of Educational Progress state data are determined to be more accurate.…
Descriptors: College Applicants, College Entrance Examinations, Estimation (Mathematics), Item Bias
