Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Credibility | 2 |
Evaluation Methods | 2 |
Models | 2 |
Accuracy | 1 |
Adults | 1 |
Aesthetics | 1 |
Classification | 1 |
Comparative Analysis | 1 |
Correlation | 1 |
Cost Effectiveness | 1 |
Difficulty Level | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
American Journal of Evaluation | 2 |
Author
Azzam, Tarek | 1 |
Coryn, Chris L. S. | 1 |
Hartmann, David J. | 1 |
Hattie, John A. | 1 |
Jones, Natalie D. | 1 |
Knight, Ciara | 1 |
Sabarre, Nina | 1 |
Scriven, Michael | 1 |
Skousen, Darrel | 1 |
Wanzer, Dana Linnell | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 2 |
Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Jones, Natalie D.; Azzam, Tarek; Wanzer, Dana Linnell; Skousen, Darrel; Knight, Ciara; Sabarre, Nina – American Journal of Evaluation, 2020
One of the most widely used communication tools in evaluation is the logic model. Despite its extensive use, there has been little research into the visualization aspect of the logic model. To assess the impact that design modifications would have on its effectiveness, we applied established visualization principles to revise a program model.…
Descriptors: Logical Thinking, Models, Visualization, Accuracy
Coryn, Chris L. S.; Hattie, John A.; Scriven, Michael; Hartmann, David J. – American Journal of Evaluation, 2007
This research describes, classifies, and comparatively evaluates national models and mechanisms used to evaluate research and allocate research funding in 16 countries. Although these models and mechanisms vary widely in terms of how research is evaluated and financed, nearly all share the common characteristic of relating funding to some measure…
Descriptors: Ethics, Evaluation Methods, Comparative Analysis, Resource Allocation