Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Dialogs (Language) | 2 |
| Science Instruction | 2 |
| Teaching Methods | 2 |
| Biology | 1 |
| College Science | 1 |
| Conflict | 1 |
| Controversial Issues (Course… | 1 |
| Cooperative Learning | 1 |
| Discourse Analysis | 1 |
| Environmental Education | 1 |
| Fuels | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Tests/Questionnaires | 2 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
| Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkSolli, Anne; Hillman, Thomas; Mäkitalo, Åsa – Research in Science Education, 2019
In this article, we argue that students' unfolding discourse on socio-scientific issues (SSI) can be fruitfully analyzed by using dialogical theories of language and communication (Bakhtin 1986; Linell 2009). While research in science education often reports on how individual reasoning changes when bringing SSI into the classroom, we argue for the…
Descriptors: Science Instruction, Controversial Issues (Course Content), Thinking Skills, Discourse Analysis
May, S. Randolph; Cook, David L.; May, Marilyn K. – American Biology Teacher, 2013
Biology courses have thousands of words to learn in order to intelligently discuss the subject and take tests over the material. Biological fluency is an important goal for students, and practical methods based on constructivist pedagogies can be employed to promote it. We present a method in which pairs of students write dialogues from…
Descriptors: Biology, Science Instruction, Cooperative Learning, Dialogs (Language)
