Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 2 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
| Experiments | 3 |
| Memory | 3 |
| Cognitive Processes | 2 |
| Recall (Psychology) | 2 |
| Undergraduate Students | 2 |
| Accuracy | 1 |
| Biology | 1 |
| Cheating | 1 |
| Correlation | 1 |
| Cues | 1 |
| Deception | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Fiacconi, Chris M. | 1 |
| Gopal, Arpita | 1 |
| Hope, Lorraine | 1 |
| Laursen, Skylar J. | 1 |
| Mangiulli, Ivan | 1 |
| Mitton, Evan E. | 1 |
| Otgaar, Henry | 1 |
| Pan, Steven C. | 1 |
| Rickard, Timothy C. | 1 |
| Riesthuis, Paul | 1 |
| Skinner, Jasmyn | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 3 |
| Reports - Research | 3 |
| Tests/Questionnaires | 3 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 2 |
| Postsecondary Education | 2 |
Audience
Location
| California | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Riesthuis, Paul; Otgaar, Henry; Hope, Lorraine; Mangiulli, Ivan – Applied Cognitive Psychology, 2021
The proposed experiment will examine the effect of deceptive behavior on memory. Participants will be assigned to a "strong-incentive to cheat" or "weak-incentive to cheat" condition and play the adapted Sequential Dyadic Die-Rolling paradigm. Specifically, Player A (computer; participants think it is another participant)…
Descriptors: Incentives, Deception, Cheating, Memory
Fiacconi, Chris M.; Mitton, Evan E.; Laursen, Skylar J.; Skinner, Jasmyn – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2020
Judgments of learning (JOLs) refer to explicit predictions regarding the likelihood of remembering newly acquired information on a later test of memory. In recent years, there has been considerable interest in understanding the processes that underlie such judgments. Recent theorizing on this matter has characterized JOLs as inferential in…
Descriptors: Metacognition, Memory, Tests, Cues
Pan, Steven C.; Gopal, Arpita; Rickard, Timothy C. – Journal of Educational Psychology, 2016
Does correctly answering a test question about a multiterm fact enhance memory for the entire fact? We explored that issue in 4 experiments. Subjects first studied Advanced Placement History or Biology facts. Half of those facts were then restudied, whereas the remainder were tested using "5 W" (i.e., "who, what, when, where",…
Descriptors: Undergraduate Students, Testing, Test Items, Memory

Peer reviewed
Direct link
