Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 2 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Author
| Crocco, Margaret | 1 |
| Elizabeth Isidro | 1 |
| Eric B. Claravall | 1 |
| Frasier, Amanda Slaten | 1 |
| Halvorsen, Anne-Lise | 1 |
| Jacobsen, Rebecca | 1 |
| Robin Irey | 1 |
| Schmitt, Adam | 1 |
| Segall, Avner | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
| Tests/Questionnaires | 2 |
Education Level
| Elementary Education | 1 |
| Grade 7 | 1 |
| High Schools | 1 |
| Junior High Schools | 1 |
| Middle Schools | 1 |
| Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkEric B. Claravall; Elizabeth Isidro; Robin Irey – Reading & Writing Quarterly, 2024
Historical reasoning, as a disciplinary literacy, aims to develop higher-order thinking in addition to depth of historical knowledge beyond the textbook and memorization of facts. It teaches students to use information across multiple sources to contextualize and corroborate historical accounts, constructing an informed yet critical interpretation…
Descriptors: Middle School Students, History Instruction, Abstract Reasoning, Thinking Skills
Jacobsen, Rebecca; Halvorsen, Anne-Lise; Frasier, Amanda Slaten; Schmitt, Adam; Crocco, Margaret; Segall, Avner – Theory and Research in Social Education, 2018
This mixed-methods study analyzed adolescents' evaluation of the trustworthiness of different kinds of evidence and their reasons for why they trusted (or did not trust) them. Specifically, we analyzed adolescents' rankings of seven kinds of evidence in the abstract and in the context of a settled historical event (school desegregation) and…
Descriptors: High School Students, Thinking Skills, Comprehension, Evidence
