Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Access to Information | 1 |
| College Students | 1 |
| Context Effect | 1 |
| Extracurricular Activities | 1 |
| Focus Groups | 1 |
| Ideology | 1 |
| Intercultural Communication | 1 |
| Interviews | 1 |
| Job Applicants | 1 |
| Listening | 1 |
| Literary Genres | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Composition Forum | 1 |
Author
| Randazzo, Chalice | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
| Tests/Questionnaires | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Download full textRandazzo, Chalice – Composition Forum, 2015
Traditional Rhetorical Genre Study (RGS) methods are not well adapted to study exclusion because excluded information and people are typically absent from the genre, and some excluded information is simply unrelated to the genre because of genre conventions or social context. Within genre-based silences, how can scholars differentiate between an…
Descriptors: Mixed Methods Research, Literary Genres, Rhetoric, Research Problems
