Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 1 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Accuracy | 1 |
| Affordances | 1 |
| Artificial Intelligence | 1 |
| Barriers | 1 |
| Biomedicine | 1 |
| Concept Formation | 1 |
| Critical Thinking | 1 |
| Design | 1 |
| Engineering Education | 1 |
| Scientific Research | 1 |
| Technical Writing | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Biomedical Engineering… | 1 |
Author
| Beth A. Lopour | 1 |
| Christine E. King | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
| Tests/Questionnaires | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkChristine E. King; Beth A. Lopour – Biomedical Engineering Education, 2025
Challenge: In engineering classrooms, generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools, such as ChatGPT, can supplement traditional teaching methods and have the potential to improve learning outcomes. However, there are also significant drawbacks, including the possibility of over-reliance on the tools and the hindrance of critical thinking, which…
Descriptors: Critical Thinking, Artificial Intelligence, Technology Uses in Education, Concept Formation
