Publication Date
| In 2026 | 3 |
| Since 2025 | 206 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 1098 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 2172 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 3308 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Location
| Australia | 111 |
| Turkey | 108 |
| China | 93 |
| United Kingdom | 93 |
| Germany | 87 |
| Iran | 71 |
| Spain | 66 |
| Taiwan | 66 |
| Canada | 65 |
| Indonesia | 57 |
| Netherlands | 54 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
| Meets WWC Standards without Reservations | 2 |
| Meets WWC Standards with or without Reservations | 2 |
| Does not meet standards | 4 |
Peer reviewedWard, Thomas J., Jr.; And Others – Journal of Educational Computing Research, 1989
Discussion of computer-assisted testing focuses on a study of college students that investigated whether a computerized test which incorporated traditional test taking interfaces had any effect on students' performance, anxiety level, or attitudes toward the computer. Results indicate no difference in performance but a significant difference in…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Comparative Analysis, Computer Assisted Testing, Higher Education
Peer reviewedMetz, Dale Evan; And Others – Journal of Communication Disorders, 1992
A preliminary scheme for estimating the speech intelligibility of hearing-impaired speakers from acoustic parameters, using a computerized artificial neural network to process mathematically the acoustic input variables, is outlined. Tests with 60 hearing-impaired speakers found the scheme to be highly accurate in identifying speakers separated by…
Descriptors: Acoustics, Computer Assisted Testing, Computer Oriented Programs, Estimation (Mathematics)
Hicken, Samuel – Collegiate Microcomputer, 1993
Describes a pilot study that examined issues encountered when computers were used for a master's degree comprehensive examination. Computer-based testing is discussed; procedures used for administering the exam are detailed; pre- and posttests that examined student attitudes are described; and recommendations for using computers in comprehensive…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Higher Education, Masters Degrees, Pilot Projects
Peer reviewedJamieson, Joan; And Others – System, 1993
The value of open-ended responses for computer-assisted-language-learning lessons and language tests is asserted. Results from a study in which students' notes and recall protocols of computerized reading passages were scored by both people and computers indicate that computer programs can score reliably with people, and in less time. (45…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Instruction, Computer Assisted Testing, Language Tests, Reading Comprehension
Travis, Betty – Collegiate Microcomputer, 1991
Presents a description and evaluation of a microcomputer-based system designed to diagnose errors in basic algorithmic procedures made by students in a college remedial mathematics class. The paper-and-pencil diagnostic test is described, and results of pretests and posttests for the computer group and control group are discussed. (five…
Descriptors: Algorithms, Computer Assisted Testing, Computer Software Evaluation, Diagnostic Tests
Peer reviewedArcia, Emily; And Others – Journal of School Psychology, 1991
Explored validity of Neurobehavioral Evaluation System, set of computerized tests and examined validity of reaction time variability as index of sustained attention. Findings from 105 children showed children able to complete 4 of tests. Findings from subsample of 88 children showed test performance significantly associated with teacher ratings of…
Descriptors: Attention, Children, Computer Assisted Testing, Elementary Education
Peer reviewedWise, Steven L.; Finney, Sara J.; Enders, Craig K.; Freeman, Sharon A.; Severance, Donald D. – Applied Measurement in Education, 1999
Examined whether providing item review on a computerized adaptive test could be used by examinees to inflate their scores. Two studies involving 139 undergraduates suggest that examinees are not highly proficient at discriminating item difficulty. A simulation study showed the usefulness of a strategy identified by G. Kingsbury (1996) as a way to…
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Difficulty Level, Higher Education
Peer reviewedVispoel, Walter P. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1998
Studied effects of administration mode [computer adaptive test (CAT) versus self-adaptive test (SAT)], item-by-item answer feedback, and test anxiety on results from computerized vocabulary tests taken by 293 college students. CATs were more reliable than SATs, and administration time was less when feedback was provided. (SLD)
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, College Students, Computer Assisted Testing, Feedback
Peer reviewedClauser, Brian E.; Swanson, David B.; Clyman, Stephen G. – Applied Measurement in Education, 1999
Performed generalizability analyses of expert ratings and computer-produced scores for a computer-delivered performance assessment of physicians' patient management skills. The two automated scoring systems produced scores for the 200 medical students that were approximately as generalizable as those produced by the four expert raters. (SLD)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Computer Assisted Testing, Generalizability Theory, Higher Education
Peer reviewedCalvo, Manuel G. – Language and Cognitive Processes, 2000
Investigated the role of context constraints on the course of predictive inferences during reading. Constraints were determined by manipulations of a context sentence that affected the extent to which an event was predictable. (Author/VWL)
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, College Students, Computer Assisted Testing, Context Effect
Peer reviewedWingenbach, Gary J. – Journal of Agricultural Education, 2000
College agriculture students who took pencil-and-paper tests scored significantly higher than those taking electronic versions of the tests. Those with a field independent learning style scored significantly higher than field-dependent students, had lower computer anxiety, and enjoyed using computers more. (SK)
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Agricultural Education, Computer Assisted Testing, Computer Literacy
Peer reviewedSawaki, Yasuyo – Language Learning & Technology, 2001
Addresses issues surrounding the effect of mode of presentation on second language (L2) reading test performance, reviewing the literature in cognitive ability testing in educational and psychological measurement and the non-assessment literature in ergonomics, education, psychology, and first language reading research. Generalization of the…
Descriptors: Cognitive Ability, Computer Assisted Testing, Language Tests, Reading Tests
Peer reviewedHippisley, Jonathan; Douglas, Graham – British Journal of Educational Technology, 1998
A study of 331 elementary school children tested the reliability of a computer resident interactive arithmetic test and found high levels of reliability, using single sitting and parallel forms methods. The study also tried to determine the validity of the interactive test by comparing it with arithmetic subtests of the Key Math Test (KMT). (PEN)
Descriptors: Arithmetic, Computer Assisted Testing, Diagnostic Tests, Educational Technology
Peer reviewedMacCann, Robert; Eastment, Benjamin; Pickering, Samantha – British Journal of Educational Technology, 2002
Describes a two-part study involving 14- to 15-year-old high school students in New South Wales (Australia) that compared two modes of responding to free response examination questions: by computer and by pen and paper. Discusses results of analysis of variance. (Author/LRW)
Descriptors: Analysis of Variance, Computer Assisted Testing, Elementary Secondary Education, Foreign Countries
Peer reviewedSykes, Robert C.; Ito, Kyoko – Applied Psychological Measurement, 1997
Evaluated the equivalence of scores and one-parameter logistic model item difficulty estimates obtained from computer-based and paper-and-pencil forms of a licensure examination taken by 418 examinees. There was no effect of either order or mode of administration on the equivalences. (SLD)
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Estimation (Mathematics), Health Personnel, Item Response Theory


