Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 39 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 131 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 212 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 266 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Researchers | 6 |
| Practitioners | 5 |
| Teachers | 5 |
Location
| China | 17 |
| Indonesia | 13 |
| Turkey | 13 |
| Iran | 12 |
| Taiwan | 12 |
| Thailand | 11 |
| Saudi Arabia | 9 |
| Hong Kong | 8 |
| South Korea | 7 |
| Canada | 6 |
| Japan | 6 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| Education Consolidation… | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
| Does not meet standards | 1 |
Xing Hu; Wen Gong – Education and Information Technologies, 2025
Amid the growing interest in generative AI technologies like ChatGPT for educational purposes, this research seeks to better understand Chinese EFL learners' acceptance and usage of them for L2 writing purposes. This study conducts an investigation by establishing a structural equation model that incorporates the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM)…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Artificial Intelligence, Computer Software, Technology Integration
Jessie S. Barrot – Language Teaching Research Quarterly, 2024
This paper explores the transformative potential of integrating generative artificial intelligence (AI) technologies, particularly ChatGPT, into second language (L2) writing pedagogy. The paper begins by examining the evolution of L2 writing pedagogy and highlighting the strengths and limitations of each. It then discusses the integration of…
Descriptors: Writing Instruction, Computer Software, Synchronous Communication, Artificial Intelligence
Elizabeth L. Wetzler; Kenneth S. Cassidy; Margaret J. Jones; Chelsea R. Frazier; Nickalous A. Korbut; Chelsea M. Sims; Shari S. Bowen; Michael Wood – Teaching of Psychology, 2025
Background: Generative artificial intelligence (AI) represents a potentially powerful, time-saving tool for grading student essays. However, little is known about how AI-generated essay scores compare to human instructor scores. Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare the essay grading scores produced by AI with those of human…
Descriptors: Essays, Writing Evaluation, Scores, Evaluators
Yang Jiang; Beata Beigman Klebanov; Jiangang Hao; Paul Deane; Oren E. Livne – Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 2025
Background: Writing is integral to educational success at all levels and to success in the workplace. However, low literacy is a global challenge, and many students lack sufficient skills to be good writers. With the rapid advance of technology, computer-based tools that provide automated feedback are being increasingly developed. However, mixed…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Writing Evaluation, Middle School Students, High School Students
Joalise Janse van Rensburg – Discover Education, 2024
The ability to think critically is an important and valuable skill that students should develop to successfully solve problems. The process of writing requires critical thinking (CT), and the subsequent piece of text can be viewed as a product of CT. One of the strategies educators may use to develop CT is modelling. Given ChatGPT's ability to…
Descriptors: Critical Thinking, Writing Instruction, Computer Software, Artificial Intelligence
Ekrem Solak – International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 2024
The integration of ChatGPT and artificial intelligence (AI) has led to innovative ideas in academic writing. This shift has improved the efficiency and quality of academic content, yet it also raises ethical concerns regarding authorship, originality, and maintaining academic rigor. This study aims to explore the interplay between AI and academic…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Academic Language, Teaching Methods, Computer Software
Guy J. Krueger – Thresholds in Education, 2025
Generative AI has become a quotidian discussion topic in many writing departments, and the conversations often focus on the negative aspects or the disruptions it has caused. A growing number of teachers and scholars, though, have embraced the new technology and welcomed it into their classrooms. In the Spring 2024 semester, students in my…
Descriptors: Writing Instruction, Artificial Intelligence, Computer Software, Technology Integration
Daniel R. Fredrick; Thomas P. Corbin Jr.; Gregory VanderPyl – Athens Journal of Education, 2025
This paper analyzes essay writing in AI (ChatGPT) and high school students, focusing on their use of specific details. Discussing the writing examples from Waltzer, Cox, and Heyman's study, we employ Aristotle's rhetorical theory to explore how clarity is achieved through specificity in writing. The analysis reveals both ChatGPT and students…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Technology Integration, Computer Software, Essays
Mimi Li – International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching, 2024
This paper discusses the increasingly prominent role of ChatGPT in providing feedback and assessment for L2 writing in the digital age. It reviews representative studies that address five research strands about the use of ChatGPT in L2 writing contexts. After a critical evaluation of the existing literature, the author extensively explains four…
Descriptors: Second Language Learning, Feedback (Response), Evaluation, Artificial Intelligence
Mona Abdelfattah – Higher Learning Research Communications, 2025
Objective: In this study, I investigate the efficacy of Microsoft (MS) Teams Class Notebook e-portfolios as a reflective tool in business writing courses. I address gaps in the literature regarding e-portfolio use in business writing courses in face-to-face classes, focusing on student perceptions, the impact of e-portfolios on writing skills, the…
Descriptors: Computer Software, Portfolios (Background Materials), Electronic Publishing, Business Education
YeonJoo Jung; Yoonkyeong Bae – Journal of Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics, 2025
This study investigated the development of syntactic complexity in second language (L2) learner essays, focusing on how key syntactic features evolve as L2 learners practice writing through the use of an automated written corrective feedback (AWCF) tool. Using a corpus of essays written across three writing sessions, five indices of syntactic…
Descriptors: English (Second Language), Second Language Learning, Writing Instruction, Syntax
Kee Li Li – Anatolian Journal of Education, 2025
The preparation of pre-service teachers (PSTs) for future English as a second language (ESL) writing instruction requires not only strong writing knowledge but also effective pedagogical practices. Despite growing interest in digital technologies, little is known about how digital writing tools can support PSTs' academic writing development.…
Descriptors: Preservice Teachers, Language Teachers, English (Second Language), Second Language Instruction
Molly Chehak; Maggie Debelius; Jake Holtschlag; Grace Kim; Kenny Le; Sarah Lyons; Hugo Nutting; Sophia Oh – International Journal for Students as Partners, 2025
We present a case study of co-creating a policy for the use of generative artificial intelligence (AI) in a writing course at Georgetown University in Washington, DC. Students and faculty in two sections of a required 1st-year writing course worked to draft and respond to a policy about AI and then reflected on the experience. Student reflections…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Computer Software, Policy Formation, Writing Instruction
Autumn B. Hostetter; Natalie Call; Grace Frazier; Tristan James; Cassandra Linnertz; Elizabeth Nestle; Miaflora Tucci – Teaching of Psychology, 2025
Background: Psychology instructors frequently assign writing-to-learn exercises that include personal reflection. Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) can write text that passes for humans in other domains. Objective: Do students and faculty rate a reflection written by GenAI differently than reflections written by students? Do students and…
Descriptors: Student Attitudes, Teacher Attitudes, College Faculty, Undergraduate Students
Duong Thi Thuy Mai; Nguyen Van Hanh – International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching, 2024
This study investigated whether English proficiency (EP) and English self-efficacy (ESE) influence the credibility of ChatGPT-generated English content (CCGEC) of college students in the English-medium instruction (EMI) courses. We observed a college-level EMI course called "Technical Writing and Presentation", where instructors…
Descriptors: Language Proficiency, Self Efficacy, Credibility, Artificial Intelligence

Peer reviewed
Direct link
