Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Author
| Anderson, Robin D. | 1 |
| Ehren, M. C. M. | 1 |
| Finney, Sara J. | 1 |
| Hatch, T. | 1 |
| Marsh, Kimberly R. | 1 |
| Swerdzewski, Peter J. | 1 |
| Zilberberg, Anna | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
| Tests/Questionnaires | 1 |
Education Level
| Elementary Education | 1 |
| Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| New York | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| No Child Left Behind Act 2001 | 1 |
| Race to the Top | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkEhren, M. C. M.; Hatch, T. – Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 2013
Many studies point to potential unintended consequences of accountability systems such as when schools narrow their teaching to fixate on tested subjects. As a result, some states and districts in the USA have complemented the federal test-based accountability system with additional measures of educational practices to hold schools accountable on…
Descriptors: Accountability, Elementary Schools, High Stakes Tests, Outcome Measures
Download full textZilberberg, Anna; Anderson, Robin D.; Swerdzewski, Peter J.; Finney, Sara J.; Marsh, Kimberly R. – Research & Practice in Assessment, 2012
Despite the extensive testing for federal accountability mandates, college students' understanding of federal accountability testing (e.g., No Child Left Behind, Race to the Top, Spellings) has not been examined, resulting in a lack of knowledge regarding how such understanding (or lack thereof) impacts college students' behavior on accountability…
Descriptors: Accountability, Testing Programs, Federal Programs, Federal Regulation
