NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 52 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Harpreet Auby; Namrata Shivagunde; Vijeta Deshpande; Anna Rumshisky; Milo D. Koretsky – Journal of Engineering Education, 2025
Background: Analyzing student short-answer written justifications to conceptually challenging questions has proven helpful to understand student thinking and improve conceptual understanding. However, qualitative analyses are limited by the burden of analyzing large amounts of text. Purpose: We apply dense and sparse Large Language Models (LLMs)…
Descriptors: Student Evaluation, Thinking Skills, Test Format, Cognitive Processes
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Mike Perkins; Jasper Roe; Darius Postma; James McGaughran; Don Hickerson – Journal of Academic Ethics, 2024
This study explores the capability of academic staff assisted by the Turnitin Artificial Intelligence (AI) detection tool to identify the use of AI-generated content in university assessments. 22 different experimental submissions were produced using Open AI's ChatGPT tool, with prompting techniques used to reduce the likelihood of AI detectors…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Student Evaluation, Identification, Natural Language Processing
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Abdulkadir Kara; Eda Saka Simsek; Serkan Yildirim – Asian Journal of Distance Education, 2024
Evaluation is an essential component of the learning process when discerning learning situations. Assessing natural language responses, like short answers, takes time and effort. Artificial intelligence and natural language processing advancements have led to more studies on automatically grading short answers. In this review, we systematically…
Descriptors: Automation, Natural Language Processing, Artificial Intelligence, Grading
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Stephanie Fuchs; Alexandra Werth; Cristóbal Méndez; Jonathan Butcher – Journal of Engineering Education, 2025
Background: High-quality feedback is crucial for academic success, driving student motivation and engagement while research explores effective delivery and student interactions. Advances in artificial intelligence (AI), particularly natural language processing (NLP), offer innovative methods for analyzing complex qualitative data such as feedback…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Training, Data Analysis, Natural Language Processing
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Jussi S. Jauhiainen; Agustín Garagorry Guerra – Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 2025
The study highlights ChatGPT-4's potential in educational settings for the evaluation of university students' open-ended written examination responses. ChatGPT-4 evaluated 54 written responses, ranging from 24 to 256 words in English. It assessed each response using five criteria and assigned a grade on a six-point scale from fail to excellent,…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Technology Uses in Education, Student Evaluation, Writing Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Sami Baral; Eamon Worden; Wen-Chiang Lim; Zhuang Luo; Christopher Santorelli; Ashish Gurung; Neil Heffernan – Grantee Submission, 2024
The effectiveness of feedback in enhancing learning outcomes is well documented within Educational Data Mining (EDM). Various prior research have explored methodologies to enhance the effectiveness of feedback to students in various ways. Recent developments in Large Language Models (LLMs) have extended their utility in enhancing automated…
Descriptors: Automation, Scoring, Computer Assisted Testing, Natural Language Processing
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Lae Lae Shwe; Sureena Matayong; Suntorn Witosurapot – Education and Information Technologies, 2024
Multiple Choice Questions (MCQs) are an important evaluation technique for both examinations and learning activities. However, the manual creation of questions is time-consuming and challenging for teachers. Hence, there is a notable demand for an Automatic Question Generation (AQG) system. Several systems have been created for this aim, but the…
Descriptors: Difficulty Level, Computer Assisted Testing, Adaptive Testing, Multiple Choice Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Arzu Atasoy; Saieed Moslemi Nezhad Arani – Education and Information Technologies, 2025
There is growing interest in the potential of Artificial Intelligence (AI) to assist in various educational tasks, including writing assessment. However, the comparative efficacy of human and AI-powered systems in this domain remains a subject of ongoing exploration. This study aimed to compare the accuracy of human raters (teachers and…
Descriptors: Writing (Composition), Writing Evaluation, Student Evaluation, Artificial Intelligence
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Alexandra Farazouli; Teresa Cerratto-Pargman; Klara Bolander-Laksov; Cormac McGrath – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2024
AI chatbots have recently fuelled debate regarding education practices in higher education institutions worldwide. Focusing on Generative AI and ChatGPT in particular, our study examines how AI chatbots impact university teachers' assessment practices, exploring teachers' perceptions about how ChatGPT performs in response to home examination…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Natural Language Processing, Student Evaluation, Educational Change
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Jining Han; Yuying Yang; Geping Liu – European Journal of Education, 2025
The rapid emergence of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) in academic settings has led to growing concerns about its impact on writing and assessment practices. This paper reviews the latest literature on detecting GenAI-generated content and explores the challenges and potential solutions faced by educators. This study identifies various…
Descriptors: Literature Reviews, Artificial Intelligence, Writing Evaluation, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Jiahui Luo – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2024
This study offers a critical examination of university policies developed to address recent challenges presented by generative AI (GenAI) to higher education assessment. Drawing on Bacchi's 'What's the problem represented to be' (WPR) framework, we analysed the GenAI policies of 20 world-leading universities to explore what are considered problems…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Educational Policy, College Students, Student Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Diana Šimic; Barbara Šlibar; Jelena Gusic Mundar; Sabina Rako – Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 2025
Researchers and practitioners from different disciplines (e.g., educational science, computer science, statistics) continuously enter the rapidly developing research field of learning analytics (LA) and bring along different perspectives and experiences in research design and methodology. Scientific communities share common problems, concepts,…
Descriptors: Learning Analytics, Higher Education, Science Education, Publications
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Botelho, Anthony; Baral, Sami; Erickson, John A.; Benachamardi, Priyanka; Heffernan, Neil T. – Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 2023
Background: Teachers often rely on the use of open-ended questions to assess students' conceptual understanding of assigned content. Particularly in the context of mathematics; teachers use these types of questions to gain insight into the processes and strategies adopted by students in solving mathematical problems beyond what is possible through…
Descriptors: Natural Language Processing, Artificial Intelligence, Computer Assisted Testing, Mathematics Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Saida Ulfa; Ence Surahman; Agus Wedi; Izzul Fatawi; Rex Bringula – Knowledge Management & E-Learning, 2025
Online assessment is one of the important factors in online learning today. An online summary assessment is an example of an open-ended question, offering the advantage of probing students' understanding of the learning materials. However, grading students' summary writings is challenging due to the time-consuming process of evaluating students'…
Descriptors: Knowledge Management, Automation, Documentation, Feedback (Response)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Okan Bulut; Tarid Wongvorachan – OTESSA Conference Proceedings, 2022
Feedback is an essential part of the educational assessment that improves student learning. As education changes with the advancement of technology, educational assessment has also adapted to the advent of Artificial Intelligence (AI). Despite the increasing use of online assessments during the last decade, a limited number of studies have…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Artificial Intelligence, Technology Uses in Education, Natural Language Processing
Previous Page | Next Page »
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4