NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 10 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Julia-Kim Walther; Martin Hecht; Steffen Zitzmann – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2025
Small sample sizes pose a severe threat to convergence and accuracy of between-group level parameter estimates in multilevel structural equation modeling (SEM). However, in certain situations, such as pilot studies or when populations are inherently small, increasing samples sizes is not feasible. As a remedy, we propose a two-stage regularized…
Descriptors: Sample Size, Hierarchical Linear Modeling, Structural Equation Models, Matrices
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Naoto Yamashita – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2024
Matrix decomposition structural equation modeling (MDSEM) is introduced as a novel approach in structural equation modeling, contrasting with traditional structural equation modeling (SEM). MDSEM approximates the data matrix using a model generated by the hypothetical model and addresses limitations faced by conventional SEM procedures by…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Factor Structure, Robustness (Statistics), Matrices
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Julia-Kim Walther; Martin Hecht; Benjamin Nagengast; Steffen Zitzmann – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2024
A two-level data set can be structured in either long format (LF) or wide format (WF), and both have corresponding SEM approaches for estimating multilevel models. Intuitively, one might expect these approaches to perform similarly. However, the two data formats yield data matrices with different numbers of columns and rows, and their "cols :…
Descriptors: Data, Monte Carlo Methods, Statistical Distributions, Matrices
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Haiyan Liu; Sarah Depaoli; Lydia Marvin – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2022
The deviance information criterion (DIC) is widely used to select the parsimonious, well-fitting model. We examined how priors impact model complexity (pD) and the DIC for Bayesian CFA. Study 1 compared the empirical distributions of pD and DIC under multivariate (i.e., inverse Wishart) and separation strategy (SS) priors. The former treats the…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Bayesian Statistics, Goodness of Fit, Factor Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Oort, Frans J.; Jak, Suzanne – Research Synthesis Methods, 2016
Meta-analytic structural equation modeling (MASEM) involves fitting models to a common population correlation matrix that is estimated on the basis of correlation coefficients that are reported by a number of independent studies. MASEM typically consist of two stages. The method that has been found to perform best in terms of statistical…
Descriptors: Maximum Likelihood Statistics, Meta Analysis, Structural Equation Models, Correlation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Enders, Craig K.; Tofighi, Davood – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2008
The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of misspecifying a growth mixture model (GMM) by assuming that Level-1 residual variances are constant across classes, when they do, in fact, vary in each subpopulation. Misspecification produced bias in the within-class growth trajectories and variance components, and estimates were…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Computation, Monte Carlo Methods, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Savalei, Victoria – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2008
Normal theory maximum likelihood (ML) is by far the most popular estimation and testing method used in structural equation modeling (SEM), and it is the default in most SEM programs. Even though this approach assumes multivariate normality of the data, its use can be justified on the grounds that it is fairly robust to the violations of the…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Testing, Factor Analysis, Maximum Likelihood Statistics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Maydeu-Olivares, Alberto; Hernandez, Adolfo – Multivariate Behavioral Research, 2007
The interpretation of a Thurstonian model for paired comparisons where the utilities' covariance matrix is unrestricted proved to be difficult due to the comparative nature of the data. We show that under a suitable constraint the utilities' correlation matrix can be estimated, yielding a readily interpretable solution. This set of identification…
Descriptors: Identification, Structural Equation Models, Matrices, Comparative Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Hayashi, Kentaro; Arav, Marina – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2006
In traditional factor analysis, the variance-covariance matrix or the correlation matrix has often been a form of inputting data. In contrast, in Bayesian factor analysis, the entire data set is typically required to compute the posterior estimates, such as Bayes factor loadings and Bayes unique variances. We propose a simple method for computing…
Descriptors: Bayesian Statistics, Factor Analysis, Correlation, Matrices
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Furlow, Carolyn F.; Beretvas, S. Natasha – Psychological Methods, 2005
Three methods of synthesizing correlations for meta-analytic structural equation modeling (SEM) under different degrees and mechanisms of missingness were compared for the estimation of correlation and SEM parameters and goodness-of-fit indices by using Monte Carlo simulation techniques. A revised generalized least squares (GLS) method for…
Descriptors: Rejection (Psychology), Monte Carlo Methods, Least Squares Statistics, Correlation