Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Reader Response | 3 |
| Reputation | 3 |
| Court Litigation | 2 |
| Opinions | 2 |
| Reader Text Relationship | 2 |
| Authors | 1 |
| Childrens Literature | 1 |
| Classics (Literature) | 1 |
| Constitutional Law | 1 |
| Editorials | 1 |
| Foreign Countries | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Cohen, Jeremy | 2 |
| Styles, Morag | 1 |
Publication Type
| Reports - Research | 3 |
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
| Elementary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| First Amendment | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Styles, Morag – Oxford Review of Education, 2010
In the last twenty years, the teaching of reading in Britain has moved away from an interest in how children take delight in, and make meaning of, their literature to a preoccupation with a mechanistic approach to literacy which breaks down texts into bite-sized chunks and fragments reading into a series of isolated skills. Although an expensive,…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Reading Instruction, Teaching Methods, Childrens Literature
Peer reviewedCohen, Jeremy; And Others – Journalism Quarterly, 1989
Presents experimental tests of assumptions about the ways in which readers distinguish fact from opinion in a defamatory context. Examines differences in impact on readers based upon their perceptions of whether a report is fact or opinion. Finds that opinion causes more harm to reputation than does fact. (MM)
Descriptors: Court Litigation, Journalism, News Reporting, Opinions
Cohen, Jeremy; And Others – 1988
A study of reader response to newspaper articles in a defamatory context tested: (1) the judicial assumption that the macro-environment in which statements appear is important to a reader's distinguishing between fact and opinion; (2) the possibility that a byline may influence a reader's characterization of statements; and (3) the idea that…
Descriptors: Constitutional Law, Court Litigation, Editorials, Freedom of Speech

Direct link
