Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Paired Associate Learning | 3 |
| Prompting | 3 |
| Educational Research | 2 |
| Adults | 1 |
| College Students | 1 |
| Cues | 1 |
| Evaluative Thinking | 1 |
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Intermode Differences | 1 |
| Reading Comprehension | 1 |
| Tachistoscopes | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Ariel, Robert | 1 |
| Guthrie, Peter M. | 1 |
| Johnson, Kirk A. | 1 |
| Karpicke, Jeffrey D. | 1 |
| Lumsdaine, Arthur A. | 1 |
| Tauber, Sarah K. | 1 |
| Witherby, Amber E. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Reports - Research | 3 |
| Journal Articles | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
| Meets WWC Standards without Reservations | 1 |
| Meets WWC Standards with or without Reservations | 1 |
Peer reviewed
Direct linkAriel, Robert; Karpicke, Jeffrey D.; Witherby, Amber E.; Tauber, Sarah K. – Educational Psychology Review, 2021
When people make judgments of learning (JOLs) after studying paired associates, the process they engage in to monitor their learning can directly enhance learning for some types of material (Soderstrom et al. 2015). The current experiments investigated whether JOLs directly enhance learning educationally relevant texts. Across 5 experiments (N =…
Descriptors: Paired Associate Learning, Evaluative Thinking, Reading Comprehension, Textbooks
Guthrie, Peter M.; Lumsdaine, Arthur A. – 1961
To investigate the effect of several cueing methods on paired-associate learning, 48 adult subjects were asked to learn pairs of city names and corresponding airport codes using special cueing procedures or standard anticipation procedures. Visibility of the response term, and hence cue strength, was varied tachistoscopically, adjusting the…
Descriptors: Adults, Cues, Educational Research, Paired Associate Learning
Johnson, Kirk A. – 1964
Three experiments were performed to extend the research using the Subject Matter Trainer (SMT), an early teaching machine. Various training modes were compared. In all three experiments, the subject's task was to learn adjective pairs. Experiment I used the anticipation method. A test slide was shown first with an adjective singled out at the top…
Descriptors: College Students, Educational Research, Higher Education, Intermode Differences
