NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 5 results Save | Export
Tollefson, Nona; Tripp, Alice – 1986
The item difficulty and item discrimination of three multiple-choice item formats were compared in experimental and non-experimental settings. In the experimental study, 104 graduate students were randomly assigned to complete one of three forms of a multiple-choice test: (1) a complex alternative ("none of the above") as the correct answer; (2) a…
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Difficulty Level, Discriminant Analysis, Graduate Students
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Waters, L. K.; And Others – Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1982
Multitrait-multimethod analysis was performed on instructors' ratings from behaviorally anchored rating scales, graphic rating scales, and mixed standard scales. Two samples of 100 undergraduate students were distinguished on the basis of whether the statements on the mixed-standard scale were behaviorally specific or more generic descriptions of…
Descriptors: Behavior Rating Scales, Discriminant Analysis, Higher Education, Interrater Reliability
Melancon, Janet G.; Thompson, Bruce – 1988
Applied classical measurement theory was used to study the measurement characteristics of Forms A and B of the Finding Embedded Figures Test (FEFT) when the test is administered in a "no-guessing" or "supply" format. Data provided by 69 students at a private university in the southern United States were used. Both forms of the…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Difficulty Level, Discriminant Analysis, Guessing (Tests)
Lancaster, Diana M.; And Others – 1987
Difficulty and discrimination ability were compared between multiple choice and short answer items in midterm and final examinations for the internal medicine course at Louisiana State University School of Dentistry. The examinations were administered to 67 sophomore dental students in that course. Additionally, the impact of the source of the…
Descriptors: Dental Schools, Dentistry, Difficulty Level, Discriminant Analysis
Federico, Pat-Anthony – 1989
To determine the relative reliabilities and validities of paper-based and computer-based measurement procedures, 83 male student pilots and radar intercept officers were administered computer and paper-based tests of aircraft recognition. The subject matter consisted of line drawings of front, side, and top silhouettes of aircraft. Reliabilities…
Descriptors: Armed Forces, Comparative Analysis, Computer Assisted Testing, Discriminant Analysis