Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 6 |
Descriptor
| Behavior | 8 |
| Discrimination Learning | 8 |
| Stimuli | 4 |
| College Students | 2 |
| Comparative Analysis | 2 |
| Experiments | 2 |
| Intervals | 2 |
| Observation | 2 |
| Reinforcement | 2 |
| Training | 2 |
| Accuracy | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Journal of the Experimental… | 3 |
| Developmental Science | 1 |
| Journal of Experimental Child… | 1 |
| Journal of Organizational… | 1 |
| Psychological Record | 1 |
| Research in Developmental… | 1 |
Author
| Fields, Lanny | 2 |
| Alvero, Alicia M. | 1 |
| Arntzen, Erik | 1 |
| Balsamo, Lyn M. | 1 |
| Brannon, Elizabeth M. | 1 |
| Dickson, Chata A. | 1 |
| Dube, William V. | 1 |
| Eilifsen, Christoffer | 1 |
| Farren, Kevin M. | 1 |
| Garruto, Michelle | 1 |
| Hieser, Rex A. | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 8 |
| Reports - Research | 8 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 2 |
| Postsecondary Education | 2 |
| Early Childhood Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Norway | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Effects of a Meaningful, a Discriminative, and a Meaningless Stimulus on Equivalence Class Formation
Fields, Lanny; Arntzen, Erik; Nartey, Richard; Eilifsen, Christoffer – Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 2012
Thirty college students attempted to form three 3-node 5-member equivalence classes under the simultaneous protocol. After concurrent training of AB, BC, CD, and DE relations, all probes used to assess the emergence of symmetrical, transitive, and equivalence relations were presented for two test blocks. When the A-E stimuli were all abstract…
Descriptors: College Students, Visual Stimuli, Classification, Behavior
Taylor, Matthew A.; Alvero, Alicia M. – Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 2012
The intent of the present study was to assess the effects of discrimination training only and in combination with frequent safety observations on five participants' safety-related behavior in a simulated office setting. The study used a multiple-baseline design across safety-related behaviors. Across all participants and behavior, safety improved…
Descriptors: Safety, Behavior, Discrimination Learning, Training
Reynolds, Gemma; Reed, Phil – Research in Developmental Disabilities: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2011
Stimulus over-selectivity refers to behavior being controlled by one element of the environment at the expense of other equally salient aspects of the environment. Four experiments trained and tested non-clinical participants on a two-component trial-and-error discrimination task to explore the effects of different training regimes on…
Descriptors: Reinforcement, Stimuli, Experiments, Training
Fields, Lanny; Garruto, Michelle; Watanabe, Mari – Psychological Record, 2010
Conditional discrimination or matching-to-sample procedures have been used to study a wide range of complex psychological phenomena with infrahuman and human subjects. In most studies, the percentage of trials in which a subject selects the comparison stimulus that is related to the sample stimulus is used to index the control exerted by the…
Descriptors: Stimuli, Behavior, Statistical Analysis, Discrimination Learning
Dube, William V.; Dickson, Chata A.; Balsamo, Lyn M.; O'Donnell, Kristin Lombard; Tomanari, Gerson Y.; Farren, Kevin M.; Wheeler, Emily E.; McIlvane, William J. – Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 2010
Restricted stimulus control refers to discrimination learning with atypical limitations in the range of controlling stimuli or stimulus features. In the study reported here, 4 normally capable individuals and 10 individuals with intellectual disabilities (ID) performed two-sample delayed matching to sample. Sample-stimulus observing was recorded…
Descriptors: Behavior, Observation, Discrimination Learning, Mental Retardation
Peer reviewedHieser, Rex A.; Rosenbaum, Milton E. – Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1980
In experiment one, the experimenter delivered frequent or infrequent social reinforcement that was either contingent or noncontingent. In experiment two, seating arrangements were varied so that information concerning the direction of reinforcement was made ambiguous. (RH)
Descriptors: Behavior, Children, Discrimination Learning, Influences
Brannon, Elizabeth M.; Suanda, Sumarga; Libertus, Klaus – Developmental Science, 2007
Time perception is important for many aspects of human behavior, and a large literature documents that adults represent intervals and that their ability to discriminate temporal intervals is ratio dependent. Here we replicate a recent study by vanMarle and Wynn (2006 ) that used the visual habituation paradigm and demonstrated that temporal…
Descriptors: Intervals, Infants, Discrimination Learning, Time Factors (Learning)
Odum, Amy L.; Shahan, Timothy A.; Nevin, John A. – Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 2005
This experiment examined the effects of reinforcement probability on resistance to change of remembering and response rate. Pigeons responded on a two- component multiple schedule in which completion of a variable-interval 20-s schedule produced delayed matching-to-sample trials in both components. Each session included four delays (0.1 s, 2 s, 4…
Descriptors: Memory, Probability, Reinforcement, Intervals

Direct link
