Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Screening Tests | 4 |
| Adjustment (to Environment) | 3 |
| Behavior Rating Scales | 3 |
| Public Schools | 3 |
| Student Placement | 3 |
| Test Validity | 3 |
| Adults | 2 |
| Cultural Influences | 2 |
| Data Analysis | 2 |
| Diagnostic Tests | 2 |
| Elementary Education | 2 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Lambert, Nadine M. | 3 |
| Allen, D. G. | 1 |
| Black, Jessica | 1 |
| Cohen, D. | 1 |
| Felce, D. | 1 |
| Field, Bryony | 1 |
| Groves, S. | 1 |
| Ivimey, John K. | 1 |
| Lowe, K. | 1 |
| Meek, A. | 1 |
| Perry, J. | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Reports - Research | 6 |
| Journal Articles | 3 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
| California | 1 |
| United Kingdom (Wales) | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Adaptive Behavior Scale | 6 |
| Wechsler Adult Intelligence… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Direct linkStirk, Steven; Field, Bryony; Black, Jessica – Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 2018
Background: The Learning Disability Screening Questionnaire (LDSQ) has been shown to have high sensitivity and specificity to identify those who are likely to meet intellectual disability diagnostic criteria (McKenzie, et al. [McKenzie K., 2015]). However, there is no independent research to date to support these findings. Materials and Methods:…
Descriptors: Learning Disabilities, Questionnaires, Screening Tests, Diagnostic Tests
Perry, J.; Allen, D. G.; Pimm, C.; Meek, A.; Lowe, K.; Groves, S.; Cohen, D.; Felce, D. – Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 2013
Background: People with severe challenging behaviour are vulnerable to exclusion from local services and removal to out-of-area placements if locally available supported accommodation is insufficient to meet their needs. There are concerns about the high costs and potentially poorer outcomes of out-of-area placements but relatively little is known…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Adults, Late Adolescents, Comparative Analysis
Peer reviewedTaylor, Ronald L.; Ivimey, John K. – Psychology in the Schools, 1982
Advanced special education students rated 23 of the domains of the Adaptive Behavior Scale (ABS). Results indicated that the most important considerations for determining method of measurement for ABS were: time necessary to obtain behavioral sample and severity of behavior. Suggests the domains of ABS be rearranged and redefined. (RC)
Descriptors: Behavior Development, Behavior Patterns, College Students, Data Analysis
Download full textLambert, Nadine M. – 1977
Six school districts in California provided data on the Public School Version of the Adaptive Behavior Scale for 373 children, ages three through six, who were enrolled in regular and trainable mentally retarded (TMR) preschool programs. The results of the study are reported as means and standard deviations of the domain scores for Part One and…
Descriptors: Adjustment (to Environment), Age Differences, Behavior Rating Scales, Cultural Influences
Lambert, Nadine M. – 1977
A representative sample of California school psychologists was surveyed to determine the extent of the use of the Adaptive Behavior Scale and the relationship between training in the use of the scale and perceptions of the efficacy of its measures. A large majority of psychologists had used the scale two or fewer times, though 30-45% had been…
Descriptors: Adjustment (to Environment), Behavior Rating Scales, Black Students, Counselor Attitudes
Lambert, Nadine M. – 1977
This study determined whether or not there were significant differences between ratings of parents and teachers on the Adaptive Behavior Scale, Public School Version. Interviews with parents of approximately 150 white and Spanish-surnamed children from 7 to 12 years assigned to educable mentally retarded (EMR) classes were used in conjunction with…
Descriptors: Adjustment (to Environment), Behavior Rating Scales, Cultural Influences, Elementary Education
