NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Publication Type
Journal Articles3
Reports - General3
Reports - Research1
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing all 3 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Sawilowsky, Shlomo S.; Hillman, Stephen B. – Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1992
Notes that studies in psychology often have low power because of inadequate sample size and that prevalent psychometric distributions are sometimes radically nonnormal. Demonstrates robustness of independent samples t-test with respect to Type I error. Shows that researchers may use power tables based on population normality without modification…
Descriptors: Psychometrics, Research Problems, Sample Size
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Strube, Michael J. – Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1991
Demonstrates low probability that nonequivalence will produce erroneous inferences in small samples. Sees probability of erroneous inference in absence of true treatment effect as generally no greater than nominal Type I error rate. Seems unlikely that small samples have biased inferences drawn from past psychotherapy outcome research. Cites other…
Descriptors: Outcomes of Treatment, Psychotherapy, Research Problems, Sample Size
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Strube, Michael J. – Journal of Counseling Psychology, 1988
Demonstrates that magnitude-of-effects (ME) estimates vary in susceptibility to sample-size bias depending on whether they are directional or nondirectional estimates. Also demonstrates that study characteristics that influence size of ME estimates can be explicitly taken into account when comparing studies. Emphasizes need to consider study…
Descriptors: Data Analysis, Effect Size, Estimation (Mathematics), Meta Analysis