Descriptor
| Occupational Tests | 4 |
| Test Reliability | 4 |
| Test Validity | 3 |
| Adults | 2 |
| Disabilities | 2 |
| Vocational Rehabilitation | 2 |
| Ability Identification | 1 |
| Adaptive Testing | 1 |
| Aptitude Tests | 1 |
| Career Development | 1 |
| Comparative Testing | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
Publication Type
| Reports - General | 4 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 2 |
| Tests/Questionnaires | 2 |
Education Level
Audience
| Practitioners | 3 |
| Researchers | 2 |
| Counselors | 1 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Differential Aptitude Test | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Roessler, Richard; Bolton, Brian – 1987
The Employability Maturity Interview (EMI) is a 10-item structured interview developed to assess readiness for the vocational rehabilitation planning process and the need for additional vocational exploration and employability services. The items deal with occupational choice, self-appraisal of abilities, self-appraisal of personality…
Descriptors: Adults, Career Development, Diagnostic Tests, Disabilities
Roessler, Richard; And Others – 1987
The Work Performance Assessment (WPA) is a brief work simulation designed to evaluate job maintenance skills, emphasizing work-related social/interpersonal skills rather than specific vocational skills. The WPA uses three work samples involving sorting of food service items to measure 19 common work demands in four categories: responding to…
Descriptors: Adults, Disabilities, Interpersonal Competence, Job Performance
McBride, James R. – 1986
An overview of the development of a computerized version of the Differential Aptitude Tests (DAT) is presented. It describes the previously existing printed version of the DAT, design of the computerized adaptive edition, calibration of the test items for use in the computerized version, and two field studies that compared the Adaptive and…
Descriptors: Ability Identification, Adaptive Testing, Aptitude Tests, Comparative Testing
Bernknopf, Stan; And Others – 1979
The effectiveness of a model for determining a minimal cut-off score for criterion-referenced tests was examined. The model, based upon techniques presented originally by Nedelsky and by Angoff, was first used in conjunction with a multiple choice test developed for use in certifying school counselors in Georgia. A "knowledge estimation panel" was…
Descriptors: Counselor Certification, Court Litigation, Criterion Referenced Tests, Cutting Scores


