Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Evaluation Methods | 3 |
| Intelligence Tests | 3 |
| Diagnostic Tests | 2 |
| Ability Grouping | 1 |
| Ability Identification | 1 |
| Academic Aptitude | 1 |
| Adolescents | 1 |
| Classification | 1 |
| Cognitive Processes | 1 |
| Cultural Differences | 1 |
| Data | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| DeBlassie, Richard R. | 1 |
| Dombrowski, Stefan C. | 1 |
| Gischlar, Karen L. | 1 |
| Roberts, Eileen | 1 |
| Siders, James A. | 1 |
| Whorton, James E. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 3 |
| Reports - General | 3 |
| Opinion Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Dombrowski, Stefan C.; Gischlar, Karen L. – Journal of Applied School Psychology, 2014
The authors encourage those in the field of school psychology to consider the use of learning disabilities assessment practices in relation to specific American Psychological Association and National Association of School Psychologists ethical codes and in regard to the American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association,…
Descriptors: Learning Disabilities, Disability Identification, Ethics, School Psychology
Peer reviewedRoberts, Eileen; DeBlassie, Richard R. – Adolescence, 1983
Defines test bias as a phenomenon in which test scores result in negative outcomes for certain groups, often lower socioeconomic groups and minorities. Discusses three manifestations of test bias including content, atmosphere, and use bias and presents recommendations for remedying bias problems in testing the culturally different. (JAC)
Descriptors: Adolescents, Cultural Differences, Evaluation Methods, Intelligence Tests
Peer reviewedSiders, James A.; Whorton, James E. – Elementary School Guidance and Counseling, 1982
Proposes a method of standardizing the assessment units of measurement that apply to individualized education program (IEP) development. The model presented consists of four phases: (1) ability assessment, (2) achievement assessment, (3) discrepancy assessment, and (4) program development. Suggests a careful analysis of information may affect IEP…
Descriptors: Ability Grouping, Ability Identification, Academic Aptitude, Diagnostic Tests

Direct link
