Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Source
| Journal of Early Intervention | 2 |
| Intervention in School and… | 1 |
| Journal of Psychoeducational… | 1 |
| Journal of Visual Impairment… | 1 |
| London Review of Education | 1 |
Author
| Bricker, Diane D. | 2 |
| Adame, Cindy | 1 |
| Doyle, Lesley | 1 |
| Fishley, Katelyn M. | 1 |
| Gamez, Brenda | 1 |
| Godfrey, Ray | 1 |
| Graham-Day, Kristall J. | 1 |
| Hannan, Cheryl Kamei | 1 |
| Konrad, Moira | 1 |
| McLean, Lauren | 1 |
| Notari, Angela R. | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 6 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 6 |
Education Level
| Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
| Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
| Practitioners | 2 |
Location
| United Kingdom (England) | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| No Child Left Behind Act 2001 | 2 |
| Elementary and Secondary… | 1 |
| Individuals with Disabilities… | 1 |
| Individuals with Disabilities… | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
| Wechsler Individual… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Graham-Day, Kristall J.; Fishley, Katelyn M.; Konrad, Moira; Peters, Mary T.; Ressa, Virginia A. – Intervention in School and Clinic, 2014
With many states moving toward increased accountability for all teachers, special educators, who have long been held accountable through the implementation of individualized education programs and the use of evidence-based practices, have much to offer. Formative instructional practices are evidence-based techniques that are familiar to special…
Descriptors: State Standards, Educational Practices, Program Implementation, Formative Evaluation
Vaughan-Jensen, Jessica; Adame, Cindy; McLean, Lauren; Gamez, Brenda – Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 2011
This article reviews "Wechsler Individual Achievement Test-Third Edition" (WIAT-III), which is designed to assess students' skills in listening, speaking, reading, writing, and mathematics. The test can identify an individual's strengths and weaknesses, assist professionals who are determining whether a student is eligible for special…
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Individualized Education Programs, Educational Legislation, Federal Legislation
Peer reviewedNotari, Angela R.; Bricker, Diane D. – Journal of Early Intervention, 1990
The Evaluation and Programming System: Assessment Level I (EPS-I) was evaluated for effectiveness in developing individual education goals among handicapped or at-risk infants and young children. Early interventionists (N=48) used EPS-I and other instruments to develop goals which were compared. Findings indicate EPS-I goals were functional,…
Descriptors: At Risk Persons, Disabilities, Evaluation Methods, Individualized Education Programs
Peer reviewedBricker, Diane D.; And Others – Journal of Early Intervention, 1990
This study examined psychometric properties and usefulness of the Evaluation and Programming System: Assessment Level I (EPS-I) by analyzing validity, reliability, and utility data from 335 nonhandicapped, at-risk, and handicapped infants and young children. Outcomes portrayed EPS-I as a valid, reliable, and helpful instrument for developing and…
Descriptors: At Risk Persons, Disabilities, Early Intervention, Evaluation Methods
Hannan, Cheryl Kamei – Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 2007
In this qualitative study, various professionals in specialized schools for students who are visually impaired provided information on assessment tools; how information was used to plan Individualized Education Programs; and their opinions on the reliability, validity, and usefulness of various measurements. The implications of the findings for…
Descriptors: Individualized Instruction, Individualized Education Programs, Qualitative Research, Visual Impairments
Doyle, Lesley; Godfrey, Ray – London Review of Education, 2005
"Personalised learning" and the value of national assessment data in achieving it have been identified by the UK Secretary of State for Education and Skills as essential for raising educational standards. Employing multilevel analysis, this paper compares children's end of primary school (Key Stage 2) test scores with those they achieved…
Descriptors: Test Results, Academic Achievement, Predictive Validity, National Competency Tests

Direct link
