Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 3 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 3 |
Education Level
| Middle Schools | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Hedges, Larry V. – Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 2007
A common mistake in analysis of cluster randomized trials is to ignore the effect of clustering and analyze the data as if each treatment group were a simple random sample. This typically leads to an overstatement of the precision of results and anticonservative conclusions about precision and statistical significance of treatment effects. This…
Descriptors: Statistical Significance, Computation, Cluster Grouping, Statistics
Peer reviewedFowler, Robert L. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1987
This paper develops a general method for comparing treatment magnitudes for research employing multiple treatment fixed effects analysis of variance designs, which may be used for main effects with any number of levels without regard to directionality. (Author/BS)
Descriptors: Analysis of Variance, Comparative Analysis, Effect Size, Hypothesis Testing
Peer reviewedMagee, Kevin N.; Overall, John E. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1992
Formulae for estimating individual rater reliabilities from analysis of treatment effects are presented and evaluated. Monte Carlo methods illustrate the formulae. Results indicate that large sample sizes, large true treatment effects, and large differences in the actual reliabilities of raters are required for the approach to be useful. (SLD)
Descriptors: Effect Size, Estimation (Mathematics), Experimental Groups, Mathematical Formulas

Direct link
