NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 3 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Hedges, Larry V. – Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 2007
A common mistake in analysis of cluster randomized trials is to ignore the effect of clustering and analyze the data as if each treatment group were a simple random sample. This typically leads to an overstatement of the precision of results and anticonservative conclusions about precision and statistical significance of treatment effects. This…
Descriptors: Statistical Significance, Computation, Cluster Grouping, Statistics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Fowler, Robert L. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1987
This paper develops a general method for comparing treatment magnitudes for research employing multiple treatment fixed effects analysis of variance designs, which may be used for main effects with any number of levels without regard to directionality. (Author/BS)
Descriptors: Analysis of Variance, Comparative Analysis, Effect Size, Hypothesis Testing
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Magee, Kevin N.; Overall, John E. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1992
Formulae for estimating individual rater reliabilities from analysis of treatment effects are presented and evaluated. Monte Carlo methods illustrate the formulae. Results indicate that large sample sizes, large true treatment effects, and large differences in the actual reliabilities of raters are required for the approach to be useful. (SLD)
Descriptors: Effect Size, Estimation (Mathematics), Experimental Groups, Mathematical Formulas