Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 5 |
Descriptor
Source
| Bureau of Indian Education | 1 |
| Education Next | 1 |
| Evaluation and Program… | 1 |
| Mathematica Policy Research,… | 1 |
| Public Policy Institute of… | 1 |
| US Census Bureau | 1 |
Author
| Aldeman, Chad | 1 |
| Hock, Heinrich | 1 |
| Isenberg, Eric | 1 |
| Jackson, Russell H. | 1 |
| Jaquet, Karina | 1 |
| Larsen, S. Eric | 1 |
| Latting, Jean Kantambu | 1 |
| Lipscomb, Stephen | 1 |
Publication Type
| Reports - Evaluative | 6 |
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Numerical/Quantitative Data | 2 |
| Opinion Papers | 1 |
Education Level
| Elementary Secondary Education | 4 |
Audience
| Policymakers | 1 |
Location
| California | 1 |
| District of Columbia | 1 |
| Texas | 1 |
| United States | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| No Child Left Behind Act 2001 | 2 |
| Race to the Top | 2 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Direct linkAldeman, Chad – Education Next, 2017
When President Obama took office in 2009, his administration quickly seized on teacher evaluations as an important public-policy problem. Today, much of his legacy on K-12 education rests on efforts to revamp evaluations in the hopes of improving teaching across the country, which his administration pursued via a series of incentives for states.…
Descriptors: Teacher Evaluation, Elementary Secondary Education, Academic Achievement, Educational Policy
Larsen, S. Eric; Lipscomb, Stephen; Jaquet, Karina – Public Policy Institute of California, 2011
Federal education policy will soon undergo a major revision, with significant consequences for the state's own policy and practices. This report seeks to help federal and state policymakers consider this restructuring and one of its core questions: How should schools and school districts be held accountable for the academic progress of their…
Descriptors: Sanctions, Federal Legislation, Economically Disadvantaged, Academic Achievement
Download full textUS Census Bureau, 2011
This document presents 2010 data from the Small Area Income and Poverty Estimates (SAIPE) program of the U.S. Census Bureau. The SAIPE program produces poverty estimates for the total population and median household income estimates annually for all counties and states. SAIPE data also produces single-year poverty estimates for the school-age…
Descriptors: Poverty, Income, Federal Programs, Social Indicators
Isenberg, Eric; Hock, Heinrich – Mathematica Policy Research, Inc., 2012
This report describes the value-added models used as part of teacher evaluation systems in the District of Columbia Public Schools (DCPS) and in eligible DC charter schools participating in "Race to the Top." The authors estimated: (1) teacher effectiveness in DCPS and eligible DC charter schools during the 2011-2012 school year; and (2)…
Descriptors: Teacher Evaluation, Value Added Models, Public Schools, Charter Schools
Bureau of Indian Education, 2011
The Bureau of Indian Education (BIE) funds schools located on 63 reservations in 23 states across the nation. Of the 183 schools, 59 are Bureau operated and 124 are tribally controlled. One-hundred and sixteen schools provide instructional programs, 55 provide instructional as well as boarding services and 12 peripheral dormitories provide only…
Descriptors: American Indian Education, American Indian Reservations, State Policy, Educational Planning
Peer reviewedLatting, Jean Kantambu; Jackson, Russell H. – Evaluation and Program Planning, 1990
Issues that program planners should consider in developing performance standards for the Job Training Partnership Act (JTPA) older worker programs (OWPs) are reviewed. Using goal-setting theory and the results of a two-year evaluation of OWPs in Texas, the discussion covers approaches to developing standards for programs other states. (TJH)
Descriptors: Evaluation Criteria, Federal Legislation, Federal Programs, Job Training
