Descriptor
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Decoding (Reading) | 1 |
| Disabilities | 1 |
| Dyslexia | 1 |
| Elementary School Students | 1 |
| Grade 3 | 1 |
| High Stakes Tests | 1 |
| Hypothesis Testing | 1 |
| Interaction | 1 |
| Nouns | 1 |
| Oral Reading | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Exceptional Children | 1 |
Author
| Boudosquie, Amy | 1 |
| Copeland, Kim | 1 |
| Fletcher, Jack M. | 1 |
| Francis, David J. | 1 |
| Kalinowski, Sharon | 1 |
| Vaughn, Sharon | 1 |
| Young, Victoria | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
| Elementary Education | 1 |
| Grade 3 | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Texas | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkFletcher, Jack M.; Francis, David J.; Boudosquie, Amy; Copeland, Kim; Young, Victoria; Kalinowski, Sharon; Vaughn, Sharon – Exceptional Children, 2006
The interaction hypothesis proposes that valid test accommodations benefit only those with disabilities. To evaluate this hypothesis, Grade 3 students with word decoding difficulties identified with dyslexia and average decoders were randomly assigned to take the same version of the Texas reading accountability assessment under accommodated and…
Descriptors: Grade 3, Reading Difficulties, Interaction, Oral Reading
