NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 8 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Brown, Aaron A.; Bodner, Glen E. – Journal of Memory and Language, 2011
When participants must classify their recognition experiences as remembering or knowing, variables often have dissociative effects on the two judgments. In contrast, when participants independently rate recollection "and" familiarity only parallel effects have been reported. To investigate this discrepancy we compared the effects of masked priming…
Descriptors: Recognition (Psychology), Classification, Memory, Knowledge Level
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Brainerd, C. J.; Reyna, V. F. – Journal of Memory and Language, 2008
When recognition probes seem familiar but their presentation cannot be recollected, dual-process models predict that they will be attributed to too many presentation contexts--most dramatically, to multiple contexts that are mutually contradictory. This is the phenomenon of episodic over-distribution. In the conjoint-recognition and…
Descriptors: Familiarity, Memory, Models, Cognitive Processes
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Ngo, Catherine T.; Sargent, Jesse; Dopkins, Stephen – Journal of Memory and Language, 2007
Participants read lists of words and then made recognition judgments to pairs of words, each of which consisted of a prime word and a test word. At issue was the effect of a semantic relationship between the prime word and the test word on the recognition judgment to the test word. Under standard recognition conditions, semantic priming impeded…
Descriptors: Familiarity, Semantics, Memory, Word Recognition
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Gallo, David A.; Weiss, Jonathan A.; Schacter, Daniel L. – Journal of Memory and Language, 2004
We devised criterial recollection tests to investigate why testing memory for pictures elicits lower false recognition than testing memory for words. Subjects studied unrelated black words paired either with the same word in red font, a corresponding picture, or both. They then took three memory tests, always using black words: a recognition test…
Descriptors: Heuristics, Familiarity, Testing, Memory
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Criss, Amy H.; McClelland, James L. – Journal of Memory and Language, 2006
The subjective likelihood model [SLiM; McClelland, J. L., & Chappell, M. (1998). Familiarity breeds differentiation: a subjective-likelihood approach to the effects of experience in recognition memory. "Psychological Review," 105(4), 734-760.] and the retrieving effectively from memory model [REM; Shiffrin, R. M., & Steyvers, M. (1997). A model…
Descriptors: Models, Recognition (Psychology), Word Frequency, Familiarity
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Vihman, Marilyn M.; Nakai, Satsuki; DePaolis, Rory A.; Halle, Pierre – Journal of Memory and Language, 2004
The interaction between prosodic and segmental aspects of infant representations for speech was explored using the head-turn paradigm, with untrained everyday familiar words and phrases as stimuli. At 11 months English-learning infants, like French infants (Halle & Boysson-Bardies, 1994), attended significantly longer to a list of familiar lexical…
Descriptors: Infants, Word Recognition, Models, Suprasegmentals
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Marazita, John M.; Merriman, William E. – Journal of Memory and Language, 2004
Because of its potential importance for word learning, children's judgment of whether they know names for objects was investigated. In Study 1, judgment accuracy was at or near ceiling in about two-thirds of 4-year-olds, and covaried with judgment of word familiarity and with justifying novel name mapping in terms of avoidance of name overlap. The…
Descriptors: Familiarity, Age Differences, Vocabulary Development, Intelligence
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Heathcote, Andrew; Raymond, Frances; Dunn, John – Journal of Memory and Language, 2006
Does recognition memory rely on discrete recollection, continuous evidence, or both? Is continuous evidence sensitive to only the recency and duration of study (familiarity), or is it also sensitive to details of the study episode? Dual process theories assume recognition is based on recollection and familiarity, with only recollection providing…
Descriptors: Recognition (Psychology), Familiarity, Models, Memory