Descriptor
Source
| Journal of Education Finance | 3 |
Author
| Gibbs, James E. | 1 |
| Goldberg, Kalman | 1 |
| Hunter, Molly A. | 1 |
| Maiden, Jeffrey | 1 |
| Scott, Robert C. | 1 |
| Wood, R. Craig | 1 |
Publication Type
| Reports - Descriptive | 4 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 4 |
| Journal Articles | 3 |
Education Level
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedMaiden, Jeffrey; Wood, R. Craig – Journal of Education Finance, 1995
Examined disequalizing effects of two nonvoted millage rates (discretionary millage and the school capital improvement millage) when combined with revenues obtained through the equalized foundation portion of the Florida Education Finance Program. Although discretionary levies add a slightly disequalizing component to the foundation program…
Descriptors: Educational Equity (Finance), Educational Finance, Expenditure per Student, Foundation Programs
Peer reviewedGoldberg, Kalman; Scott, Robert C. – Journal of Education Finance, 2000
Presents a proposal to achieve major finance reform goals by providing property tax relief and increasing state funding out of income-tax receipts, relying on Illinois' growth dividend. The plan is funded by proportional taxes and would make school reform more politically palatable to affluent taxpayers. (28 footnotes) (MLH)
Descriptors: Economic Factors, Educational Finance, Elementary Secondary Education, Expenditure per Student
Gibbs, James E.; And Others – 1979
This description of the Tennessee equalization plan consists of (1) a description of Tennessee's current public school finance program; (2) recommendations for change in the existing program; (3) a description of the conformance of the recommended changes to the equity guidelines developed by the United States Commissioner of Education pursuant to…
Descriptors: Educational Finance, Elementary Secondary Education, Equalization Aid, Federal Aid
Peer reviewedHunter, Molly A. – Journal of Education Finance, 2000
In 1997, the Ohio Supreme Court declared the state's educational finance system unconstitutional, allowing 1 year to enact a systemic overhaul. After 3 years of public controversy, plaintiffs and the state are contesting the sufficiency of the state's response. A court-supervised remedial process may be necessary. (86 footnotes) (MLH)
Descriptors: Citizen Participation, Court Litigation, Educational Equity (Finance), Elementary Secondary Education


