Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Author
| Thurlow, Martha L. | 2 |
| Albus, Deb | 1 |
| Cormier, Damien | 1 |
| Crawford, Lindy | 1 |
| Kato, Kentaro | 1 |
| Lazarus, Sheryl S. | 1 |
| Moen, Ross E. | 1 |
| Smolkowski, Keith | 1 |
Publication Type
| Reports - Evaluative | 3 |
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Numerical/Quantitative Data | 1 |
Education Level
| Elementary Secondary Education | 3 |
| Grade 5 | 3 |
| Elementary Education | 2 |
| Grade 3 | 2 |
| Grade 8 | 2 |
| Grade 10 | 1 |
| Grade 11 | 1 |
| Grade 4 | 1 |
| Grade 6 | 1 |
| Grade 7 | 1 |
| Grade 9 | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Audience
Location
| California | 1 |
| Connecticut | 1 |
| Kansas | 1 |
| Louisiana | 1 |
| Maryland | 1 |
| North Carolina | 1 |
| North Dakota | 1 |
| Oklahoma | 1 |
| Texas | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| No Child Left Behind Act 2001 | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkKato, Kentaro; Moen, Ross E.; Thurlow, Martha L. – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 2009
Large data sets from a state reading assessment for third and fifth graders were analyzed to examine differential item functioning (DIF), differential distractor functioning (DDF), and differential omission frequency (DOF) between students with particular categories of disabilities (speech/language impairments, learning disabilities, and emotional…
Descriptors: Learning Disabilities, Language Impairments, Behavior Disorders, Affective Behavior
Crawford, Lindy; Smolkowski, Keith – Assessing Writing, 2008
Students in grades 5 and 8 completed a state writing assessment, and their first and final drafts on the extended writing portion of the test were copied and scored using the state writing rubric. The rubric consisted of three primary traits: Content and Organization, Style and Fluency, and Language Use. Scorers were blind to the study purpose and…
Descriptors: Writing Evaluation, Writing Tests, Grade 8, Grade 5
Download full textAlbus, Deb; Lazarus, Sheryl S.; Thurlow, Martha L.; Cormier, Damien – National Center on Educational Outcomes, University of Minnesota, 2009
In April 2007, Federal No Child Left Behind regulations were finalized that provided states with additional flexibility for assessing some students with disabilities. The regulations allowed states to offer another assessment option, alternate assessments based on modified academic achievement standards (AA-MAS). States are not required to have…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, Educational Objectives, Outcomes of Education, Academic Achievement
