Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Experiments | 2 |
| Memory | 2 |
| Stimuli | 2 |
| Undergraduate Students | 2 |
| Attention | 1 |
| Attention Deficit Disorders | 1 |
| Educational Psychology | 1 |
| Identification | 1 |
| Perception | 1 |
| Pretests Posttests | 1 |
| Priming | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Journal of Experimental… | 2 |
Author
| Mulligan, Neil W. | 2 |
| Dew, Ilana T. Z. | 1 |
| Peterson, Daniel | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| North Carolina | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Mulligan, Neil W.; Dew, Ilana T. Z. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2009
The generation manipulation has been critical in delineating differences between implicit and explicit memory. In contrast to past research, the present experiments indicate that generating from a rhyme cue produces as much perceptual priming as does reading. This is demonstrated for 3 visual priming tasks: perceptual identification, word-fragment…
Descriptors: Memory, Priming, Perception, Identification
Mulligan, Neil W.; Peterson, Daniel – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2008
Prior research on implicit memory appeared to support 3 generalizations: Conceptual tests are affected by divided attention, perceptual tasks are affected by certain divided-attention manipulations, and all types of priming are affected by selective attention. These generalizations are challenged in experiments using the implicit tests of category…
Descriptors: Attention, Attention Deficit Disorders, Memory, Stimuli

Peer reviewed
Direct link
