Descriptor
Author
| Harris, Mike G. | 1 |
| Hetrick, William P. | 1 |
| Kappenman, Emily S. | 1 |
| Kruschke, John K. | 1 |
| Rock, Paul B. | 1 |
| Spivey-Knowlton, Michael J. | 1 |
| Tanenhaus, Michael K. | 1 |
| Van Strien, Jan W. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 4 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 4 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Rock, Paul B.; Harris, Mike G. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2006
D. N. Lee (1976) described a braking strategy based on optical expansion in which the driver brakes so that the target's time-to-contact declines around a constant slope in the range -0.5 less than or equal to tau less than 0. The present results from a series of braking simulations confirm and extend earlier reports (E. H. Yilmaz & W. H. Warren,…
Descriptors: Hypothesis Testing, Performance, Reaction Time, Perceptual Motor Coordination
Van Strien, Jan W. – Brain and Language, 2004
To investigate whether concurrent nonverbal sound sequences would affect visual-hemifield lexical processing, lexical-decision performance of 24 strongly right-handed students (12 men, 12 women) was measured in three conditions: baseline, concurrent neutral sound sequence, and concurrent emotional sound sequence. With the neutral sequence,…
Descriptors: Auditory Stimuli, Brain Hemisphere Functions, Hypothesis Testing, Cognitive Processes
Peer reviewedTanenhaus, Michael K.; Spivey-Knowlton, Michael J. – Language and Cognitive Processes, 1996
Reviews the eye-movement paradigm and refers to recent experiments applying the paradigm to issues of spoken word recognition (e.g., lexical competitor effects), syntactic processing, reference resolution, focus, as well as issues in cross-modality integration that are central to evaluating the modularity hypothesis. (Seven references) (Author/CK)
Descriptors: Eye Movements, Hypothesis Testing, Language Processing, Models
Kruschke, John K.; Kappenman, Emily S.; Hetrick, William P. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2005
The associative learning effects called blocking and highlighting have previously been explained by covert learned attention, but evidence for learned attention has been indirect, via models of response choice. The present research reports results from eye tracking consistent with the attentional hypothesis: Gaze duration is diminished for blocked…
Descriptors: Individual Differences, Associative Learning, Attention, Causal Models

Direct link
