NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 4 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Seedhouse, Paul; Satar, Müge – Classroom Discourse, 2023
The same L2 speaking performance may be analysed and evaluated in very different ways by different teachers or raters. We present a new, technology-assisted research design which opens up to investigation the trajectories of convergence and divergence between raters. We tracked and recorded what different raters noticed when, whilst grading a…
Descriptors: Language Tests, English (Second Language), Second Language Learning, Oral Language
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Bieda, Kristen N.; Salloum, Serena J.; Hu, Sihua; Sweeny, Shannon; Lane, John; Torphy, Kaitlin – Journal of Classroom Interaction, 2020
This paper discusses the challenges and lessons learned from conducting observations to measure the quality of classroom practice for a large-scale study of elementary teachers' mathematics instruction. Specifically, this paper shares our process for obtaining valid data for quality of elementary mathematics instruction; what we learned can inform…
Descriptors: Mathematics Instruction, Classroom Observation Techniques, Elementary School Teachers, Interrater Reliability
Graham, Matthew; Milanowski, Anthony; Miller, Jackson – Online Submission, 2012
As states, districts, and schools transition toward more rigorous educator evaluation systems, they are placing additional weight on judgments about educator practice. Since teacher and principal observation ratings inherently rely on evaluators' professional judgment, there is always a question of how much the ratings depend on the particular…
Descriptors: Interrater Reliability, Evaluators, Observation, Principals
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Hung, Erick K.; Binder, Renee L.; Fordwood, Samantha R.; Hall, Stephen E.; Cramer, Robert J.; McNiel, Dale E. – Academic Psychiatry, 2012
Objective: Although health professionals increasingly are expected to be able to assess and manage patients' risk for suicide, few methods are available to evaluate this competency. This report describes development of a competency-assessment instrument for suicide risk-assessment (CAI-S), and evaluates its use in an objective structured clinical…
Descriptors: Video Technology, Feedback (Response), Focus Groups, Health Personnel