NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 6 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Humphry, Stephen M.; McGrane, Joshua A. – Australian Educational Researcher, 2015
This paper presents a method for equating writing assessments using pairwise comparisons which does not depend upon conventional common-person or common-item equating designs. Pairwise comparisons have been successfully applied in the assessment of open-ended tasks in English and other areas such as visual art and philosophy. In this paper,…
Descriptors: Writing Evaluation, Evaluation Methods, Comparative Analysis, Writing Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Knoch, Ute – Assessing Writing, 2011
Rating scales act as the de facto test construct in a writing assessment, although inevitably as a simplification of the construct (North, 2003). However, it is often not reported how rating scales are constructed. Unless the underlying framework of a rating scale takes some account of linguistic theory and research in the definition of…
Descriptors: Writing Evaluation, Writing Tests, Rating Scales, Linguistic Theory
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Huot, Brian; O'Neill, Peggy; Moore, Cindy – College English, 2010
Writing program administrators and other composition specialists need to know the history of writing assessment in order to create a rich and responsible culture of it today. In its first fifty years, the field of writing assessment followed educational measurement in general by focusing on issues of reliability, whereas in its next fifty years,…
Descriptors: Writing (Composition), Writing Evaluation, Writing Tests, Validity
Della-Piana, Gabriel M. – Phi Delta Kappan, 2008
Assessments were an important tool recommended by "A Nation at Risk;" however, a generation after that report, many of the problems with student assessment still remain. This article offers brief reflections on three somewhat overlapping but enduring issues in educational assessment: validity, construct underrepresentation in outcome measures in…
Descriptors: Educational Assessment, Disproportionate Representation, Academic Achievement, Scores
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Attali, Yigal; Burstein, Jill – Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 2006
E-rater[R] has been used by the Educational Testing Service for automated essay scoring since 1999. This paper describes a new version of e-rater (V.2) that is different from other automated essay scoring systems in several important respects. The main innovations of e-rater V.2 are a small, intuitive, and meaningful set of features used for…
Descriptors: Educational Testing, Test Scoring Machines, Scoring, Writing Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Jones, Brett D.; Egley, Robert J. – ERS Spectrum, 2005
The purpose of this paper is to discuss Florida teachers' recommendations for improving the Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) and to compare their recommendations with those of Florida administrators. Although teachers' suggestions varied as to the types and extent of remedies needed to improve the FCAT, some common themes emerged. The…
Descriptors: Test Results, Core Curriculum, Student Evaluation, Accountability