Descriptor
Author
| Harris, Robert B. | 1 |
| Karras, Ray W. | 1 |
| Kerby, William C. | 1 |
| Loesch, Larry C. | 1 |
| Lubik, Ruth E. | 1 |
| Vacc, Nicholas A. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Reports - Descriptive | 3 |
| Journal Articles | 2 |
Education Level
Audience
| Practitioners | 1 |
| Teachers | 1 |
Location
| California | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Vacc, Nicholas A.; Loesch, Larry C.; Lubik, Ruth E. – 2001
Multiple choice tests are widely viewed as the most effective and objective means of assessment. Item development is the central component of creating an effective test, but test developers often do not have the background in item development. This document describes recall, application, and analysis, the three cognitive levels of test items. It…
Descriptors: Educational Assessment, Evaluation, Item Analysis, Measures (Individuals)
Peer reviewedKarras, Ray W. – OAH Magazine of History, 1991
Comments that multiple-choice tests are objective, test some knowledge, and are easy to grade, but often ask for little more than rote recall. Offers a structure for multiple-choice questions that require evaluative thinking skills as well as knowledge of the facts. Includes discussion of objectivity, preparation, and memorization. (DK)
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluative Thinking, History Instruction, Memorization
Peer reviewedHarris, Robert B.; Kerby, William C. – Journal of Economic Education, 1997
Recommends including essay questions on state economics examinations to prevent misclassification of students. Briefly reviews the literature arguing that certain groups of students do poorly on multiple choice tests. Discusses California's experience with adopting a combined-format type test. (MJP)
Descriptors: Academic Standards, Economics, Economics Education, Educational Assessment


