Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Error Patterns | 4 |
Student Characteristics | 4 |
Prediction | 3 |
Comparative Analysis | 2 |
Dependents | 2 |
Evaluation Criteria | 2 |
Family Characteristics | 2 |
Federal Aid | 2 |
Financial Aid Applicants | 2 |
Higher Education | 2 |
Income | 2 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Reports - Descriptive | 4 |
Journal Articles | 2 |
Numerical/Quantitative Data | 2 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 1 |
Audience
Policymakers | 2 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Pell Grant Program | 2 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Powers, Daniel A. – New Directions for Institutional Research, 2012
The methods and models for categorical data analysis cover considerable ground, ranging from regression-type models for binary and binomial data, count data, to ordered and unordered polytomous variables, as well as regression models that mix qualitative and continuous data. This article focuses on methods for binary or binomial data, which are…
Descriptors: Institutional Research, Educational Research, Data Analysis, Research Methodology
Tchetagni, Josephine; Nkambou, Roger; Bourdeau, Jacqueline – Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 2006
This article presents a framework for the cognitive diagnosis of learners' errors in an interactive learning activity occurring in an intelligent learning environment. The proposed framework supports the implementation of an authoring tool. This tool helps instructional designers to specify the features of a component for cognitive diagnosis. Two…
Descriptors: Intelligent Tutoring Systems, Instructional Effectiveness, Models, Instructional Design
Advanced Technology, Inc., Reston, VA. – 1984
The development of the error prone model (EPM) for the 1984-1985 student financial aid validation criteria for Pell Grant recipient selection is discussed, based on a comparison of the 1983-1984 EPM criteria and a newly estimated EPM. Procedures/assumptions on which the new EPM was based include: a sample of 1982-1983 Pell Grant recipients…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Dependents, Error Patterns, Evaluation Criteria
Advanced Technology, Inc., Reston, VA. – 1982
The development of a number of error-prone models to select Pell Grant recipients for validation is discussed. The 1983-1984 Pell Grant validation strategy consists of a two-stage approach: selection using Pre-Established Criteria (PEC) followed by selection using Error Prone Modeling (EPM). The database used for model development consists of a…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Cost Effectiveness, Dependents, Error Patterns