Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Predictive Measurement | 3 |
| Reliability | 3 |
| Evaluation Methods | 2 |
| Bayesian Statistics | 1 |
| Bibliometrics | 1 |
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Costs | 1 |
| Effect Size | 1 |
| Evaluation Problems | 1 |
| Evaluation Research | 1 |
| Experimental Psychology | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Hopper, Mark A. | 1 |
| Iverson, Geoffrey J. | 1 |
| Kostoff, Ronald N. | 1 |
| Lee, Michael D. | 1 |
| Robinson, Sharon E. | 1 |
| Wagenmakers, Eric-Jan | 1 |
Publication Type
| Reports - Descriptive | 3 |
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Guides - General | 1 |
| Information Analyses | 1 |
| Opinion Papers | 1 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Iverson, Geoffrey J.; Wagenmakers, Eric-Jan; Lee, Michael D. – Psychological Methods, 2010
The purpose of the recently proposed "p[subscript rep]" statistic is to estimate the probability of concurrence, that is, the probability that a replicate experiment yields an effect of the same sign (Killeen, 2005a). The influential journal "Psychological Science" endorses "p[subscript rep]" and recommends its use…
Descriptors: Effect Size, Evaluation Methods, Probability, Experiments
Robinson, Sharon E.; Hopper, Mark A. – 1990
This technical manual discusses some of the recent developments in the science of graphology and their implications for the science. The manual contains the following sections: (1) Graphology: An Introduction; (2) "CHAPS": Computerized Handwriting Analysis Profiling Systems; (3) HRC Profiles; (4) Reliability; (5) Validity; (6) Historical…
Descriptors: Handwriting, Personality Traits, Predictive Measurement, Predictive Validity
Peer reviewedKostoff, Ronald N. – Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1994
Describes the practice of federal evaluation of research impact through three approaches: retrospective methods; qualitative methods, including peer review; and quantitative methods. Recommended areas for study in federal research impact assessment are suggested, including predictive reliability, comparative studies, time and cost estimates,…
Descriptors: Bibliometrics, Comparative Analysis, Costs, Evaluation Methods

Direct link
