Descriptor
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Cutting Scores | 1 |
| Generalizability Theory | 1 |
| Latent Trait Theory | 1 |
| Mathematical Models | 1 |
| Standard Setting (Scoring) | 1 |
| Standards | 1 |
Source
| Journal of Educational… | 1 |
Author
| Kane, Michael T. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedKane, Michael T. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1987
The use of item response theory models for analyzing the results of judgmental standard setting studies (the Angoff technique) for establishing minimum pass levels is discussed. A comparison of three methods indicates the traditional approach may not be best. A procedure based on generalizability theory is suggested. (GDC)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Cutting Scores, Generalizability Theory, Latent Trait Theory
