Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Experimental Psychology | 3 |
| Object Manipulation | 3 |
| Spatial Ability | 2 |
| Visual Perception | 2 |
| Associative Learning | 1 |
| Cognitive Processes | 1 |
| Cues | 1 |
| Evaluative Thinking | 1 |
| Eye Movements | 1 |
| Mechanics (Physics) | 1 |
| Motion | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Fajen, Brett R. | 1 |
| Jang, Yoonhee | 1 |
| Kliegl, Reinhold | 1 |
| Laubrock, Jochen | 1 |
| Nelson, Thomas O. | 1 |
| Risse, Sarah | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 3 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 3 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
How Many Dimensions Underlie Judgments of Learning and Recall? Evidence from State-Trace Methodology
Peer reviewed
Direct linkJang, Yoonhee; Nelson, Thomas O. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2005
The authors used state-trace methodology to investigate whether a single dimension (e.g., strength) is sufficient to account for recall and judgments of learning (JOLs) or whether multiple dimensions (e.g., intrinsic and extrinsic factors) are needed. The authors separately manipulated the independent variables of intrinsic and extrinsic cues,…
Descriptors: Experimental Psychology, Recall (Psychology), Evaluative Thinking, Cues
Kliegl, Reinhold; Risse, Sarah; Laubrock, Jochen – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2007
Using the gaze-contingent boundary paradigm with the boundary placed after word n, the experiment manipulated preview of word n + 2 for fixations on word n. There was no preview benefit for 1st-pass reading on word n + 2, replicating the results of K. Rayner, B. J. Juhasz, and S. J. Brown (2007), but there was a preview benefit on the 3-letter…
Descriptors: Eye Movements, Perceptual Motor Coordination, Object Manipulation, Word Order
Fajen, Brett R. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2005
Braking to avoid a collision can be controlled by keeping the deceleration required to stop (i.e., ideal deceleration) in the "safe" region below maximum deceleration, but maximum deceleration is not optically specified and can vary as conditions change. When brake strength was manipulated between participants using a simulated braking task, the…
Descriptors: Experimental Psychology, Traffic Safety, Visual Perception, Cognitive Processes
