NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Publication Type
Reports - Descriptive11
Journal Articles10
Opinion Papers1
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing all 11 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Laura Hamilton Brown – Communication Teacher, 2025
Students will analyze article excerpts that demonstrate how the opioid crisis was fueled by a five-sentence "letter to the editor" that was uncritically cited as "evidence" that opioid addiction was rare. Indirectly this activity demonstrates why ChatGPT and other generative artificial intelligence platforms should never be…
Descriptors: Letters (Correspondence), Citations (References), Evidence, Misinformation
Farley-Ripple, Elizabeth; Van Horne, Sam; Tilley, Kati; Shewchuk, Samantha; May, Henry; Micklos, Deborah Amsden; Blackman, Horatio – Center for Research Use in Education, 2022
This is the executive summary for the report, "Survey of Evidence in Education for Schools (SEE-S) Descriptive Report." In the United States, increased pressure through accountability policy and through the production and dissemination of scientifically based research are intended to create conditions for improving research use.…
Descriptors: Surveys, Schools, Educational Research, Research Utilization
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Marc T. Braverman – Journal of Human Sciences & Extension, 2019
This article examines the concept of credible evidence in Extension evaluations with specific attention to the measures and measurement strategies used to collect and create data. Credibility depends on multiple factors, including data quality and methodological rigor, characteristics of the stakeholder audience, stakeholder beliefs about the…
Descriptors: Extension Education, Program Evaluation, Evaluation Methods, Planning
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Kenneth R. Jones; Eugenia P. Gwynn; Allison M. Teeter – Journal of Human Sciences & Extension, 2019
This article provides insight into how an adequate approach to selecting methods can establish credible and actionable evidence. The authors offer strategies to effectively support Extension professionals, including program developers and evaluators, in being more deliberate when selecting appropriate qualitative and quantitative methods. In…
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Credibility, Evidence, Evaluation Criteria
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Chelsea Hetherington; Cheryl Eschbach; Courtney Cuthbertson – Journal of Human Sciences & Extension, 2019
Evaluation capacity building (ECB) is an essential element for generating credible and actionable evidence on Extension programs. This paper offers a discussion of ECB efforts in Cooperative Extension and how such efforts enable Extension professionals to collect and use credible and actionable evidence on the quality and impacts of programs.…
Descriptors: Cooperative Education, Extension Education, Capacity Building, Program Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Argyrous, George – Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice, 2015
This paper illustrates the use of a quality assessment tool for regression analysis. It is designed for non-specialist "consumers" of evidence, such as policy makers. The tool provides a series of questions such consumers of evidence can ask to interrogate regression analysis, and is illustrated with reference to a recent study published…
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Regression (Statistics), Evidence, Critical Thinking
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Mertens, Donna M.; Hesse-Biber, Sharlene – New Directions for Evaluation, 2013
We argue for a view of credible evidence that is multidimensional in philosophical and methodological terms. We advocate for the importance of deepening the meaning of credible evaluation practice and findings by bringing multiple philosophical and theoretical lenses to the evaluation process as a basis for the use of mixed methods in evaluation,…
Descriptors: Mixed Methods Research, Credibility, Evidence, Philosophy
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Chenail, Ronald J. – Qualitative Report, 2012
In the third of a series of "how-to" essays on conducting qualitative data analysis, Ron Chenail examines the dynamic tensions within the process of qualitative data analysis that qualitative researchers must manage in order to produce credible and creative results. These tensions include (a) the qualities of the data and the qualitative data…
Descriptors: Qualitative Research, Data Analysis, Evidence, Figurative Language
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Cook, Bryan G.; Cook, Lysandra; Landrum, Timothy J. – Exceptional Children, 2013
Although researchers in special education have made significant advances in defining and identifying evidence-based practices, scholars often constitute an insular group that disseminates research findings primarily through outlets and venues targeting like-minded researchers using traditional approaches. Thus, despite tangible results in…
Descriptors: Special Education, Educational Research, Information Dissemination, Evidence
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Kratochwill, Thomas R.; Hoagwood, Kimberly Eaton; Kazak, Anne E.; Weisz, John R.; Hood, Korey; Vargas, Luis A.; Banez, Gerard A. – School Psychology Review, 2012
The American Psychological Association Task Force on Evidence- Based Practice for Children and Adolescents (2008) recommended a systems approach to enhancing care in order to improve outcomes for children and adolescents with mental health needs and redress persistent systemic problems with the structure of services. Recommendations for enhancing…
Descriptors: School Psychology, Psychological Studies, Evidence, Children
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Henderson, A. Scott – Social Education, 2008
This article offers lessons from the David Irving trial. These lessons about Holocaust denial allow educators to identify how deniers violate certain scholarly tenets. This also serves as a safeguard against legitimizing deniers' efforts, while also reinforcing important principles of historical inquiry. (Contains 11 notes.)
Descriptors: Court Litigation, World History, Libel and Slander, Historians