Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 1 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 5 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 31 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 224 |
Descriptor
| Evaluation Criteria | 1131 |
| Program Evaluation | 500 |
| Evaluation Methods | 426 |
| Higher Education | 291 |
| Program Effectiveness | 219 |
| Program Descriptions | 217 |
| Elementary Secondary Education | 213 |
| Program Development | 148 |
| Foreign Countries | 124 |
| Educational Assessment | 118 |
| Program Implementation | 118 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Practitioners | 129 |
| Administrators | 57 |
| Policymakers | 36 |
| Researchers | 31 |
| Teachers | 29 |
| Media Staff | 9 |
| Students | 5 |
| Community | 4 |
| Counselors | 4 |
| Parents | 4 |
| Support Staff | 2 |
| More ▼ | |
Location
| California | 24 |
| Australia | 21 |
| Canada | 17 |
| United Kingdom | 17 |
| Florida | 16 |
| Texas | 14 |
| United States | 14 |
| Maryland | 13 |
| Pennsylvania | 13 |
| Oregon | 11 |
| Ohio | 10 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Marilee Bresciani Ludvik – Assessment Update, 2025
Higher education leaders face growing pressure to demonstrate the return on investment (ROI) of not only their institution but also each academic program offering. With increasing accountability and limited time for meaningful reflection on student learning and development, now is the time to rethink how a quasi-annual academic program review…
Descriptors: Program Evaluation, College Programs, College Outcomes Assessment, Data Use
D'Brot, Juan – National Center for the Improvement of Educational Assessment, 2022
Accountability mechanisms and processes have evolved with changes in statute. State Education Agency (SEA) accountability systems may exhibit characteristics of compliance- and/or improvement-focused systems in light of requirements under the "Elementary and Secondary Education Act" (ESEA) and its reauthorizations under the…
Descriptors: Accountability, Best Practices, Disclosure, State Departments of Education
M. Stoehr; M. Diehl; M. Morningstar; D. Rowe; B. K. Simmons; C. Fowler; D. Lattin; J. Vicchio; E. Wall – National Technical Assistance Center on Transition: The Collaborative, 2024
The National Technical Assistance Center on Transition: the Collaborative (NTACT:C) Collaborative Assessment Guide for Transition Planning (CAG) is intended to help students, family members, educators, vocational rehabilitation counselors, human services and health agency staff, and other partners develop a coordinated assessment approach for…
Descriptors: Transitional Programs, Equal Education, Educational Legislation, Students with Disabilities
Utah System of Higher Education, 2020
The Utah System of Higher Education (USHE) Board of Regents organized the State Scholarship Task Force to examine how best to redesign existing scholarship programs to meet the needs of the state without requiring additional funding. The criteria considered by the State Scholarship Task Force and their recommendations are provided. Details…
Descriptors: Scholarships, State Programs, Higher Education, Program Design
Chen, Wei-Ren; Chen, Mei-Fang – Gifted Education International, 2020
The ultimate goal of gifted education programs is to cultivate students' competences through challenging, enriching, and engaging opportunities for talent development. The purpose of this review is to present two main approaches of enrichment programs for gifted learners in Taiwan: the programs following the law and the alternative programs…
Descriptors: Program Evaluation, Gifted, Talent, Talent Development
Nellie Mae Education Foundation, 2020
The Nellie Mae Education Foundation created this Student-Centered Learning Continuum (SCL Continuum) to establish the characteristics of high-quality, student-centered learning in classrooms, schools, and districts. This continuum is based upon existing research and cutting-edge practice, incorporates the experiences of experts and practitioners,…
Descriptors: Student Centered Learning, Program Implementation, Program Evaluation, Evaluation Criteria
Strawser, Michael G.; Neuberger, Lindsay – Journal of Communication Pedagogy, 2020
Learning outcome assessment is a fairly recent trend in higher education that began in the 1980s (Lubinescu et al., 2001). Today, many faculty perceive assessment reporting to be tedious, time-consuming, and irrelevant busywork (Wang & Hurley, 2012). Unfortunately, this systematic process created to use empirical evidence to measure, document,…
Descriptors: Communication (Thought Transfer), College Outcomes Assessment, College Programs, Program Evaluation
Malte Ring; Taiga Brahm – Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 2024
More and more teachers create video explanations for their instruction. Whether or not they are effective for learning depends on the videos' instructional quality. Reliable measures to assess the quality of video explanations, however, are still rare, especially for videos created by (preservice) teachers. We developed such a measure in a…
Descriptors: Video Technology, Teaching Methods, Educational Quality, Measurement Techniques
What Works Clearinghouse, 2017
The What Works Clearinghouse (WWC) evaluates research studies that look at the effectiveness of education programs, products, practices, and policies, which the WWC calls "interventions." Many studies of education interventions make claims about impacts on students' outcomes. Some studies have designs that enable readers to make causal…
Descriptors: Program Design, Program Development, Program Effectiveness, Program Evaluation
Danilowicz, Bret; Judge, Rebecca; Hanson, Janet; Hughes, Sherri; Sundberg, Lori – Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 2020
A typology of budget-driven program reviews is categorized by two variables: the locus of responsibility and the timing of the review. When a budget-driven program review is first implemented during a crisis, the range of financial and administrative options are high, yet buy-in and match to mission are low. When a budget-driven program review is…
Descriptors: Budgets, Program Evaluation, Institutional Mission, Classification
Gouëdard, Pierre – OECD Publishing, 2021
Across OECD countries, the increasing demand for evidence-based policy making has further led governments to design policies jointly with clear measurable objectives, and to define relevant indicators to monitor their achievement. This paper discusses the importance of such indicators in supporting the implementation of education policies.…
Descriptors: Educational Indicators, Program Implementation, Educational Policy, Policy Formation
Jones, Peter A. – Journal of Public Affairs Education, 2020
Public administration scholarship has documented the effectiveness of rubrics in assessing student competencies within classrooms and across MPA programs. Rubrics are one of many innovative techniques, however. As we advance pedagogy in public administration, scholars should consider additional grading techniques and evaluate a grading system…
Descriptors: Grading, Masters Programs, Graduate Students, College Faculty
Domaleski, Chris; D'Brot, Juan; Keng, Leslie; Keglovits, Russ; Neal, Ann-Michelle – Council of Chief State School Officers, 2018
Most states have developed or revised school accountability systems in response to the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA). While these systems include multiple indicators, to many stakeholders the outcome of central interest is the overall rating or classification produced for each school. These ratings are often used to identify schools that merit…
Descriptors: Accountability, Performance Based Assessment, Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Criteria
Australian Government Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency, 2020
As part of its regulatory roles, the Australian Government Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency (TEQSA) is required to assess evidence of 'scholarship' that is put forward by providers, whether evidence of scholarship by individuals, such as teaching staff within the provider, or for the provider as a whole. TEQSA is seeking to review…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Scholarship, Program Evaluation, Evaluation Methods
Martin, Michael J.; Leuci, Mary; Stewart, Mark – Journal of Extension, 2014
The University of Missouri Extension needed to develop an annual program review process that collaboratively engaged county-level stakeholders. The results from the first 2 years highlight the results, challenges, and implications of the design process. The annual review process needs to be adaptive, responsive, and reflective from year to year…
Descriptors: Program Development, Statewide Planning, Stakeholders, Community Involvement

Peer reviewed
Direct link
