Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
Source
| Canadian Journal of Program… | 1 |
| National Research Center on… | 1 |
| Prospects: Quarterly Review… | 1 |
| Scholar-Practitioner Quarterly | 1 |
| Theory and Research in… | 1 |
Author
| Ford, Donna Y. | 1 |
| Garrison, Mark J. | 1 |
| Gullickson, Arlen R. | 1 |
| LaFrance, Joan | 1 |
| Nichols, Richard | 1 |
| Siegel, Harvey | 1 |
Publication Type
| Reports - Descriptive | 5 |
| Journal Articles | 4 |
| Opinion Papers | 2 |
Education Level
| Elementary Secondary Education | 3 |
| Higher Education | 2 |
| Adult Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| United States | 2 |
| Canada | 1 |
| Florida | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| No Child Left Behind Act 2001 | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
| Florida Comprehensive… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
LaFrance, Joan; Nichols, Richard – Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 2008
The American Indian Higher Education Consortium (AIHEC), comprising 34 American Indian tribally controlled colleges and universities, has undertaken a comprehensive effort to develop an "Indigenous Framework for Evaluation" that synthesizes Indigenous ways of knowing and Western evaluation practice. To ground the framework, AIHEC engaged…
Descriptors: Expertise, Evaluators, American Indians, Focus Groups
Gullickson, Arlen R. – Prospects: Quarterly Review of Comparative Education, 2005
"The Student Evaluation Standards" were born from the frustrations and concerns of many people who want the evaluations to better serve student learning. This paper describes those standards and how they serve student learning. The first part of this paper lays groundwork--context--by providing strong evidence that, at least in the…
Descriptors: Student Evaluation, National Standards, Educational Principles, Evaluation Methods
Ford, Donna Y. – National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented, 2004
With so many unanswered questions and controversies regarding intelligence, testing in general, and testing diverse students in particular, what can educators in gifted education do to ensure that these students have access to and are represented in gifted education programs and services? In this monograph, the author examines test bias by first…
Descriptors: Test Bias, Educational Research, Educational Testing, Standardized Tests
Siegel, Harvey – Theory and Research in Education, 2004
School and government officials, system administrators and other policymakers offer a variety of reasons for engaging in high stakes testing: to monitor student performance, to measure teacher and/or school effectiveness, to ensure accountability, etc. Some of these reasons are good; others not. But the best reason--one that is never offered,…
Descriptors: Student Evaluation, High Stakes Tests, Role of Education, Educational Assessment
Garrison, Mark J. – Scholar-Practitioner Quarterly, 2004
The author of this article challenges a common assumption made by both critics and defenders of standardized-testing technology (or psychometry), namely that standardized tests "measure" something (culture, ability, etc.). It argues that psychometric practice cannot be classified as a form of measurement and instead is best understood as…
Descriptors: Educational Assessment, Social Values, Psychometrics, Standardized Tests

Peer reviewed
Direct link
