Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Credentials | 3 |
| National Programs | 3 |
| Achievement Rating | 1 |
| Analysis of Variance | 1 |
| Barriers | 1 |
| Change | 1 |
| Coaching (Performance) | 1 |
| Community Colleges | 1 |
| Community Organizations | 1 |
| Departments | 1 |
| Disadvantaged Youth | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Reports - Descriptive | 3 |
| Journal Articles | 1 |
Education Level
| Postsecondary Education | 2 |
| Adult Education | 1 |
| Secondary Education | 1 |
| Two Year Colleges | 1 |
Audience
Location
| California (San Francisco) | 1 |
| California (San Jose) | 1 |
| Connecticut (Hartford) | 1 |
| Louisiana (New Orleans) | 1 |
| Massachusetts (Boston) | 1 |
| Pennsylvania (Philadelphia) | 1 |
| Washington (Seattle) | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Steinberg, Adria; Almeida, Cheryl – Jobs for the Future, 2019
Opportunity Works is a national initiative to dramatically improve the life trajectories of low-income young people ages 16 to 24 who are not in school or working. This population, often called "opportunity youth," comprises a significant segment of America's potential workforce. Yet they are also the young men and women who face the…
Descriptors: Young Adults, Out of School Youth, National Programs, Regional Cooperation
ACT, Inc., 2011
In 2010 ACT sponsored a strategic workforce development summit with several prominent community college presidents from across the country. The presidents provided diverse perspectives about how to effectively prepare and validate a prepared workforce. This paper represents, in part, key elements of that discussion as well as what they think is a…
Descriptors: Community Colleges, Labor Force Development, Credentials, Job Skills
Peer reviewedJackman, Robert W.; Siverson, Randolph M. – PS: Political Science and Politics, 1996
Analyzes the National Research Council's rating of political science departments and discovers the ratings reflect two general sets of characteristics, the size and productivity of the faculty. Reveals that the quality and impact of faculty research is more important than the overall output. Includes tables of statistical data. (MJP)
Descriptors: Achievement Rating, Analysis of Variance, Credentials, Departments


