Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 2 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
| Academic Freedom | 4 |
| Creationism | 4 |
| Evolution | 4 |
| Science Instruction | 4 |
| Court Litigation | 2 |
| Public Schools | 2 |
| Religious Factors | 2 |
| Anti Intellectualism | 1 |
| Best Practices | 1 |
| Citizen Participation | 1 |
| Classrooms | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 4 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 4 |
Education Level
Audience
| Teachers | 1 |
Location
| Arkansas | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| Lemon v Kurtzman | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Branch, Glenn – Phi Delta Kappan, 2020
The forces of anti-intellectualism in American life, as described by Richard Hofstadter, have been especially prominent in the battle against the teaching of evolution. Glenn Branch discusses the different aspects of anti-intellectualism that are at the root of objections to evolution and explains how creation science, which had a transparently…
Descriptors: Anti Intellectualism, Evolution, Creationism, Science Instruction
Hermann, Ronald S. – Science Teacher, 2017
Evolution, due to its importance in science, holds a prominent place in national science standards and many state standards. Scientists nearly universally agree that the theory of evolution best explains the unity and diversity of life. Accordingly, numerous science, science education, and religious organizations support the teaching of evolution…
Descriptors: Science Instruction, Evolution, Legal Problems, Controversial Issues (Course Content)
Cavanagh, Sean – Education Week, 2008
In another twist in the decades-long battle over evolution's status in public school science classrooms, state legislators are arguing that teachers have a right to raise doubts about that essential scientific theory as a matter of free speech. Similarly worded bills that attempt to protect the right of educators and students to present critiques…
Descriptors: Evolution, Academic Freedom, Legislators, Classrooms
Peer reviewedNelkin, Dorothy – Society, 1983
Discusses an Arkansas State law that required balanced treatment of creationism and evolution in the study of human origins. Describes arguments for and against the law as presented at a courtroom trial in which it was decided that the law was unconstitutional, and that creationism had no legitimate educational purpose. (Author/MJL)
Descriptors: Academic Freedom, Citizen Participation, Court Litigation, Creationism

Direct link
